From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Jan 20 14:54:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 14381 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2007 22:54:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m41.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Jan 2007 22:54:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.5) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2007 22:54:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 6966 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2007 22:52:20 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 20 Jan 2007 22:52:20 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H8P4H-0002eM-1N for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:52:15 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H8P3Z-0002bj-Oy; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:51:36 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H8P1y-0002b8-F7 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:49:56 -0800 Received: from web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.128]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H8P1n-0002ao-22 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:49:47 -0800 Received: (qmail 57308 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2007 22:49:32 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 4YRRBA0VM1kSWQ2xqAbaYEifY8wf7TgJSp3MirONHVZ7rf0B9o4bIok8n1KeiWgdBASm7SSLLyMBZb6P1sS.JrbQk1ufMNl2DDi6xSWH13wLSLh0GzQ- Received: from [70.237.232.248] by web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:49:32 PST Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:49:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20070120223532.GB21920@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <99963.55165.qm@web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Score-Int: -6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 13549 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Score-Int: -6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well, I don't much like it either, but what do you see as wrong with {mi sisku lo ka be a holy grail/black knight [no time to figure this out] lo romei}? The assumption of the gloss is, presumably, that the only way to find that property is to find something that has it. It is a dodge around intensional contexts. --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org 1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST RBL: Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.5 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: John E Clifford From: John E Clifford Reply-To: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net Subject: [lojban] Re: quest/search/sisku X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=gaVvxg_oFGYLQEGx30IvZJaw7-sXDOt8GIFdiWqCsieoiIM47A X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27988 Well, I don't much like it either, but what do you see as wrong with {mi sisku lo ka be a holy grail/black knight [no time to figure this out] lo romei}? The assumption of the gloss is, presumably, that the only way to find that property is to find something that has it. It is a dodge around intensional contexts. --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > There doesn't seem to be any word that's good for "I'm going to > search the whole world for The Holy Grail" or "I'm going to search > the countryside for The Black Knight" or whatever. > > I honestly can't think of satisfying ways to fill sisku for either > of these, and there's no other good word. Suggestions? > > -Robin > > -- > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ > Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" > Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.