From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Jan 09 20:08:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 17913 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 04:08:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m41.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Jan 2007 04:08:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.3) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 04:08:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 15394 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 04:06:22 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2007 04:06:22 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4UjB-00073O-U1 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:06:18 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4Ufr-0006zh-Az; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:02:56 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4Uf0-0006gv-I0 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:01:58 -0800 Received: from smtp2.pcisys.net ([216.229.32.109]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4Uew-0006gh-8A for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:01:58 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.106] (cwap-206-53-21-117.cos.pcisys.net [206.53.21.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.pcisys.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0A41rvG004017 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:01:53 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <45A4657D.6060000@pcisys.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:03:09 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45A32064.4070604@pcisys.net> <200701091212.49131.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: <200701091212.49131.phma@phma.optus.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13531 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ssimmons@pcisys.net X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 23:56, Stephen David Simmons wrote: > >> I also use "binjinpoi" for the "transition metals", as they are between >> the alkali/alkalines and the non-metal/metalloids/near metals; and >> "cnobinjinpoi" for the actinides/lanthanides, as they are part of the >> period that adds electrons in deeply buried subshells; and "jbijinpoi" >> for poor-metals or near-metals such as tin and aluminum (this class is >> somewhat artificial, and the English language group has already >> recognized "poor" as a bad distinguishing characteristic); and >> "si'irjinpoi" for the coinage metals (copper, silver, and gold); and >> ninpoi for the noble gases. >> > > rafsi nitpick: "jin" (djine, ring) should be "jim". > Thanks. > I noticed you wrote "blajinme" for "xinjinme". Looking at the explanation of > the name on Wikipedia, "blajinme" is correct. > Where do you see a reference to "xinjinme"? "blajinme" classified with the near metals, as a member of "jbijimpoi", though that is the most poorly defined of the groups. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.3 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Stephen David Simmons From: Stephen David Simmons Reply-To: ssimmons@pcisys.net Subject: [lojban] Re: kliru, sodna, navni, etc. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=7yDlJf9xFhYhbzUN6GabxOiuBgdTOhfUdBhzHWCbQBj_GxQEIQ X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27971 Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Monday 08 January 2007 23:56, Stephen David Simmons wrote: > >> I also use "binjinpoi" for the "transition metals", as they are between >> the alkali/alkalines and the non-metal/metalloids/near metals; and >> "cnobinjinpoi" for the actinides/lanthanides, as they are part of the >> period that adds electrons in deeply buried subshells; and "jbijinpoi" >> for poor-metals or near-metals such as tin and aluminum (this class is >> somewhat artificial, and the English language group has already >> recognized "poor" as a bad distinguishing characteristic); and >> "si'irjinpoi" for the coinage metals (copper, silver, and gold); and >> ninpoi for the noble gases. >> > > rafsi nitpick: "jin" (djine, ring) should be "jim". > Thanks. > I noticed you wrote "blajinme" for "xinjinme". Looking at the explanation of > the name on Wikipedia, "blajinme" is correct. > Where do you see a reference to "xinjinme"? "blajinme" classified with the near metals, as a member of "jbijimpoi", though that is the most poorly defined of the groups. --Stephen Simmons To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.