From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Feb 22 07:38:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 82954 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2007 15:38:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.72) by m41a.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Feb 2007 15:38:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.8) by mta14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2007 15:38:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 11146 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2007 15:37:56 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 22 Feb 2007 15:37:56 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HKG13-0005bV-5t for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:37:54 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HKFzs-0005Wz-Np; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:36:52 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:34:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HKFx0-0005Wh-4Z for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:33:42 -0800 Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HKFwp-0005SI-Rg for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:33:40 -0800 Received: from chausie (unknown [192.168.7.4]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F103CE8FC for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:33:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:25:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <3ccac5f10702200925r5672d9f7j23346557ff50888d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560702201353r2c161813pacb95207416be530@mail.gmail.com> <3ccac5f10702210930j585f1ef8ydd0b7076cd9c4ba9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3ccac5f10702210930j585f1ef8ydd0b7076cd9c4ba9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702221025.08229.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: -21 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13595 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: -21 X-Spam-Bar: -- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.8 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@phma.optus.nu Subject: [lojban] Re: morphology paper announced X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=QA1CtROiRs58WldKgYNuiqoekjzG8w_epzZQexYCXpYXvJku5Q X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 28039 On Wednesday 21 February 2007 12:30, Cyril Slobin wrote: > No, it IS different. {iglu} is handled by rule 2. C. 4) a) 3] of the > brkwords algorithm, while {ciblu} is handled by rule 2. C. 4) b) 5] a] > of that algorithm. If you want another (lengthier) example handled by > the same rule with {iglu}, consider {adjgadja}. I checked them in valfendi, which is brkwords updated, and they're handled differently. {glu} is monosyllabic, whereas {djgadja} is a slinku'i. phma To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.