From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Mar 25 21:07:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 96611 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2007 04:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.68) by m49.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Mar 2007 04:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.10) by mta11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2007 04:07:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 25767 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2007 04:07:28 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 26 Mar 2007 04:07:27 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVgUM-0005zo-Pt for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:07:23 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVgTt-0005wu-0y; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:06:56 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVgRJ-0005w8-5Q for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:04:13 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVgRI-0005w1-H3 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:04:12 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20070326040412.GS4403@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <200703251436.37039.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20070325203824.GQ4403@digitalkingdom.org> <200703251910.28201.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703251910.28201.phma@phma.optus.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-archive-position: 13635 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -3.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: -29 X-Spam-Bar: --- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.10 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: What's a better word for modals? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=Z7atRoF9xw03CH3HroqrbyahlucM5yjvVgYOGJMVSVTjYGZ27w X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 28082 On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 06:10:26PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Sunday 25 March 2007 16:38, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > sumtcita > > On Sunday 25 March 2007 15:31, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > > Preposition, perhaps? > > But don't those apply to PU and other tense markers as well, in > phrases such as {pu le nanca}? On the rare occasions the distinction is required, I use "BAI cmavo" or "cmavo be zo bai", depending on what language I'm speaking in. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.