From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Mar 25 16:14:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 9124 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2007 23:14:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.35) by m49.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Mar 2007 23:14:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.9) by mta9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2007 23:14:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 32321 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2007 23:13:46 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 25 Mar 2007 23:13:46 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVbuA-0000H6-VC for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:13:43 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVbth-0000E7-FU; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:13:15 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVbrM-0000Du-O7 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:10:49 -0700 Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVbrK-0000Dj-BZ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:10:48 -0700 Received: from chausie (unknown [192.168.7.4]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE8BCE93F for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:10:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:10:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200703251436.37039.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20070325203824.GQ4403@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20070325203824.GQ4403@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703251910.28201.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: -21 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13634 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: -21 X-Spam-Bar: -- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.9 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@phma.optus.nu Subject: [lojban] Re: What's a better word for modals? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=cqQUL5oM0CvEt5zeDRkCdp5q-zqg27dNEEF6rneyR42F4m8T-Q X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 28081 On Sunday 25 March 2007 16:38, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > sumtcita On Sunday 25 March 2007 15:31, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > Preposition, perhaps? But don't those apply to PU and other tense markers as well, in phrases such as {pu le nanca}? Pierre To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.