From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Apr 18 15:01:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 28227 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2007 22:00:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.34) by m48.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2007 22:00:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.6) by mta8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2007 22:00:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 17392 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2007 22:00:45 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 18 Apr 2007 22:00:45 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HeICV-0003uX-MR for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:00:35 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HeIBT-0003sc-GP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:59:30 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HeI9q-0003sR-UV for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:57:47 -0700 Received: from anno.name ([81.169.186.62] helo=mail.anno.name) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HeI9m-0003sK-8k for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:57:46 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.146] (p5085EECC.dip.t-dialin.net [80.133.238.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.anno.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id B056379286 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4626944D.1010408@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:57:33 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070304) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4612873B.3050900@perpetuum-immobile.de> In-Reply-To: <4612873B.3050900@perpetuum-immobile.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 OpenPGP: id=21E90840 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0466614ECD82F601F4E489D9" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13683 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.6 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Timo Paulssen From: Timo Paulssen Reply-To: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de Subject: [lojban] microphone status among lojbanists? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=HdRHxZMnv7wtvqqoHs2QGfav_CXyI8DWXCN1KbsRtr1L35qn-A X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 28139 --------------enig0466614ECD82F601F4E489D9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i just did an extremely small version of the program (lojbo ke bacru casnu ke'e samstuzi, but if you can come up with a better jbocme, go ahead!) and now i was wondering: how many lojbanists actually have working microphones? at a first glance it seemed to me that it's common among lojbanists to have either no microphone at all or a broken one :| i know that my microphone works pretty well, cizra has one, eppcott has or had one, too. robin as well (at least at the time we had STWUR). other than that i don't know who would be able to post to the lojbanic audioboard... --------------enig0466614ECD82F601F4E489D9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" [Attachment content not displayed.] --------------enig0466614ECD82F601F4E489D9--