From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 10 08:14:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 14617 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2007 15:14:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.71) by m44.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Apr 2007 15:14:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.6) by mta13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2007 15:14:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 28258 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2007 15:14:48 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Apr 2007 15:14:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbI3L-0002BO-3L for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:14:46 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbI2o-0002AY-MD; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:14:12 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbI1I-0002AK-6G for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:12:32 -0700 Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.66]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbI1B-0002A6-TT for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:12:31 -0700 Received: from [68.164.86.146] (helo=[10.0.1.2]) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HbI15-00073X-H8 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:12:19 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2707A4F5-51EA-40CB-87CD-1ACA4D7C6751@mindspring.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:12:12 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-ELNK-Trace: c82619e33d1ea3219c7f779228e2f6aeda0071232e20db4d96a3de66d92f688afbf3ab532ce1649c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Score-Int: -22 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13677 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: dcortesi@mindspring.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Score-Int: -22 X-Spam-Bar: -- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.6 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Cortesi From: Cortesi Reply-To: dcortesi@mindspring.com Subject: [lojban] Re: nutcracker and nutpick X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=mykF3feYmvp8xFflKnfn-bTobfNVS3RPfG5foY-l9KOHIYaFmg X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 28132 On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:21 AM, Pierra Abbat wrote: > a nutpick is clearly a cfinyvra (crowbar, but more generally any > lever with a > wedge at the end). Um, isn't {cfinyvra} at least a bit aurally ambiguous because of cfila/cfi x1 is a flaw/fault/defect in x2 causing x3 Anyway consider {kapkavra} (or {vralkapka}?), a digging lever. vernagvralkapka, "x1 is a nut-meat-lever-digger-outer"? Truly {to'e melbi} > Or a nutcracker could be a cinzyvra. What do you think? As cinze is already a tool, {cinzyvra} would be somewhat redundant. Did you perhaps intend {nagcinze}, nut type of pliers? Thanks for the exercise & sorry for the mistakes, DC To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.