From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue May 29 22:35:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 13486 invoked from network); 30 May 2007 05:35:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.35) by m50.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 May 2007 05:35:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.10) by mta9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 May 2007 05:35:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 11027 invoked from network); 30 May 2007 05:34:45 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 30 May 2007 05:34:45 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HtGpN-00030i-5Y for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 May 2007 22:34:35 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HtGoV-0002zf-Vg; Tue, 29 May 2007 22:33:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HtGmY-0002zI-O2 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 22:31:39 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HtGmS-0002zA-SV for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 22:31:35 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:31:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20070530053132.GW7871@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <925d17560705261631u1a110e2ejd5f37bc7efca9653@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <925d17560705261631u1a110e2ejd5f37bc7efca9653@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-archive-position: 13732 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-Spam-Score-Int: 1 X-Spam-Bar: / To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.10 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: TECH: Question about grammar of sumti X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=HexIbEyx7dZJm4IBrxv6_ijc7lnlVZQ8Q39AUgG0hpQSkBNFFQ X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 28193 On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 08:31:43PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote: > If I'm reading the formal grammars correctly, something like {lo > ci ko'a .e ko'e} will be parsed as {lo ci (ko'a .e ko'e)}, and not > as {(lo ci ko'a) .e ko'e}, as I would have expected. .ue sai .ua nai sai > Am I correct? go'i > Was this intentional? mi na djuno > If yes, what does {lo ci (ko'a .e ko'e)} mean? mi curve lo ka na djuno -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.