From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Nov 19 12:50:47 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:50:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IuDZu-0002Ll-Fg for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:50:47 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IuDZs-0002LY-5p for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:50:46 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 4so1328577nfv for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:50:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=L6eBHVmF9itht3PGhDCqvDq48P5LrOp1k3FP0C+jnYU=; b=uEAZyvdxNNWiliJBzcyqsVbMt0W2rJ5ouYhpad9V55F/xex0Sp2NIjB4rj+/km0UyXkZj9ByS0QaA8jy/G30xLpBMYclK+iqlU6DgJVpXAKQKmaiR+HeUtIYwNhZ7D47ueNXV2PuuHT36gwNf6gNg6Ka4c9i8jWzX3gnzfV1ieU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZLvfnNwtivcVxjg6TAEO7+zUYKdhYQtmu2pNKllu26jxqsY7Kqk2QaxfL0kbGYJsgn1ACB34Jh0eokNKYrxSx1EYqGJJ0vkOoOhIq2C6X//LhbiCezcd9JDDrq3cEdwJ+rgxBGi/606szhVY/9uS8+SLAmZ0YS7hXjnu8Ppw0gU= Received: by 10.86.1.1 with SMTP id 1mr5443382fga.1195505441988; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:50:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.86.13 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:50:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560711191250la44fcddp9708ad96f1b5cd35@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:50:41 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: morph question In-Reply-To: <737b61f30711191227y29cb3d8du4c2d00ab37463825@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30711191227y29cb3d8du4c2d00ab37463825@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 13961 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 11/19/07, Chris Capel wrote: > The morphology kicks out "masytcusets" as an invalid cmene. Is this > correct? (Changing it to "masytcUsetys" makes it parse.) If so, I'm > gonna try to figure out how to make a comprehensible error message for > it. Not sure it's possible to make it comprehensible to someone (like > me) who doesn't know the morphology in some detail, though. Right, that's because of the final "ts". The current version is not very happy with final consonant clusters. This is one of the points that are not at all settled, and probably the official version will end up being more lenient. You might be surprized at some of the vowel clusters that get rejected too. > On a related note, are the production names in the grammar/morphology > going to get some english-language description at any point in the > future, so that people have some reference to the meaning of the > various productions without having to read the grammar? I ask this > because I'm including some of the production names in LojGloss, but > many of them don't really have any meaning outside of the grammar > itself. I tried to make the rule names in the morphology as self-descriptive as I could, but I'm sure there's room for improvement. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.