From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Dec 15 11:00:50 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:00:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J3cFm-0004UQ-Ev for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:00:50 -0800 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J3cFh-0004UG-9o for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:00:50 -0800 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so873941fkq.2 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:00:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=t1ibS+DU9xpp6ydUgPNTLfTeXts0b3DZ2o/LwpiAjjY=; b=toNdPrv3M1aZ/cK2KRoj1sg01kdMysHRcI61JQNkTDm0C1dGFoCjzURKs0zdfQi6ZHlFd+LLkXgIlHKv5YJrJYPvvOGsvt7s47zcWwm3v1hOgAfQxJ85W6i6C3WKV+Yby8hGlgKO+4tPG0JCYRMwcV5LptV60PyHProeE0R8zQE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sdEWfktSPU9/VrYFxZfhQ5K/cc37+tFBaO6RK8n4xsaUVfubDOdCln4y4nuPAVc/PBrFVH8ptvAoKPnDsaGAt/z56RI54nD/fV7PYn4llsXZegLiK/qqa46WvXPi0TPJqkTP9XJ2/pNFWGv5ESaAtwkH3+N+PE4vXab3k5Qez3Q= Received: by 10.86.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr4438055fgb.65.1197745242912; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:00:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.86.13 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:00:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560712151100s45dd3176j8b43c0aac5615d16@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:00:42 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "This number" In-Reply-To: <97f5058c0712141606h465eeeb8y22e7358b8de0d903@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <97f5058c0712042002q563a1ebercc15fe68a57f2210@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560712051059v3b83f3e6ieee1e1aed2a7f6db@mail.gmail.com> <97f5058c0712141553gac4b952qcbd2c7610a83308e@mail.gmail.com> <97f5058c0712141559s7e303235s9f29320bd1922172@mail.gmail.com> <97f5058c0712141606h465eeeb8y22e7358b8de0d903@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14011 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Dec 14, 2007 9:06 PM, Penguino wrote: > However, (su'ore)me'i would not be the same as su'o(reme'i) .uinai Besides that problem, which could be simply defined away by choosing one interpretation as the correct one, my problem with that is that I already have a different candidate interpretation for adjacent quantifiers. I like to interpret for example {za'u re me'i xa} "more than two, less than six" as "more than two and less than six", rather than as "more than four" or as "less than four". My interpretation was proposed here: mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.