From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jan 03 06:37:05 2008 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Received: (qmail 54721 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2008 14:37:04 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (66.218.67.96) by m52.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Jan 2008 14:37:04 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.5) by mta17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2008 14:37:04 -0000 X-Received: (qmail 5892 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2008 14:37:03 -0000 X-Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 3 Jan 2008 14:37:03 -0000 X-Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JARBs-0004Ko-4F for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:37:00 -0800 X-Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JARBF-0004Ac-Tr; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:36:29 -0800 X-Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:34:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAR8z-0004AD-OI for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:34:02 -0800 X-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAR8v-00049m-DG for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:34:01 -0800 X-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so3028725fga.0 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:33:55 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.86.99.9 with SMTP id w9mr15679035fgb.44.1199370835300; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:33:55 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.86.1.11 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:33:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560801030633s1650f796j741ad63f1f96b4bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:33:55 -0300 In-Reply-To: <477C38E2.80400@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <702226df0801021635h1e3f1cd1q8e9f848ae1e2a427@mail.gmail.com> <477C38E2.80400@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14069 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.5 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" Reply-To: jjllambias@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban-English full dictionary effort- request for assistance X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=ynIxPkT4kA-cN3GhJLYgzfxz2b4_LdqWowfMO35Co7HTCLBD0Q X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 28550 On 1/2/08, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > If you coin a lujvo without > determining its place structure, you miss out on the possibility that > sel[xxxxxx] might be the best lujvo for an English concept. I suspect such lujvo will be very rare, because the tendency seems to be to interpret them as [selxxx]xxx. In jbovlaste I found only one each of types selkem[xxxxxx], terkem[xxxxxx], velkem[xxxxxx], and none with xelkem-. I couldn't find any without -kem- and meant to be interpreted as sel[xxxxxx], but there might be some and I might have missed them. Is anyone aware of any such lujvo? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.