From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Feb 05 06:54:51 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JMPBu-0002ho-VJ for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:54:46 -0800 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.224]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JMPBO-0002aP-Sw for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:54:25 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c47so1934186wra.20 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:53:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7Gub6mpHa96CRY2GerZaqbeaVFhVNE6OeyHAXYvFAu8=; b=gZEwAQW9dcN5I2SpC/bzE0q2W4LEsP7gHD1Rh5u5S0R8mvof4fldL4Q7wgvI3nIu+2ZNyyhVoawY2vUlD13K2CtQypCy2KVHzKB8XIyRz+ZYJMdFVpQSkX8zhIY4vFu6FSsax/wuSL+s3YT0K58sx30eBj3kknXMsIoh92GzrL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jTMre4i/yPY7ABqkhRc7c3ctzG9z7KB+AR2JFfehqUImK9PS+eVdxDTtjvgwI+swxc86SfcWXIUeOlYRv8fRO+y+0kVYrKSmhTo8x5jVS8t+z6K8JSFl3ckLH6cV/mQfrbrup23sUVsBnQp96ERG7O6k/ZKljUmUQfM/jSmu5D8= Received: by 10.141.15.19 with SMTP id s19mr5700007rvi.39.1202223214066; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.69.2 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:53:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <96f789a60802050653w7150f351m19c64ef71b61b960@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:53:34 -0500 From: "Michael Turniansky" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: lo questions In-Reply-To: <925d17560802031039s348b5caco36022d32efeeaff4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30802011636w6c8b6bc4hb34ab8bb417f1cf2@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560802021302h49211bddi9f801426904e6be2@mail.gmail.com> <20080202171948.7lyx8d18so84ooos@webmail.ixkey.info> <925d17560802031039s348b5caco36022d32efeeaff4@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14159 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Feb 3, 2008 1:39 PM, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > ro lo nixli cu ponse re lo gerku .i ro lo gerku cu xekri > Each girl owns two dogs. All the dogs are black. Okay, maybe now I'm confused. Why is the last sentence not "ro _le_ gerku cu xekri"? What is thte difference in implication? Can "le" perhaps mean that only the two dogs that are owned by ONE (or other subset) of the girls are black, while "lo" forces all of the dogs owned by all of the girls to be black? --gejyspa To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.