From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 14 12:30:26 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JlUNl-0005lF-Tn for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:30:26 -0700 Received: from owlserv1.mail.rice.edu ([128.42.58.120]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JlUNh-0005ky-18 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:30:25 -0700 Received: by owlserv1.mail.rice.edu (Postfix, from userid 20515) id 7F4BA13433; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:30:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from netscaler2.rice.edu (netscaler2.rice.edu [128.42.206.5]) by webmail.mail.rice.edu (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:30:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1208201419.4803b0cb4da10@webmail.mail.rice.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:30:19 -0500 From: mls1@rice.edu To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Logflash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: -1 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14361 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mls1@rice.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Quoting Bob LeChevalier : > MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > > In a message dated 4/14/2008 04:22:45 AM Central Daylight Time, lojbab > > via ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > > >> But LogFlash is deemed old-fashioned by > >> Lojbanists. > > > > So I've gathered, but it's still the only program I use for vocabulary > > practice. Maybe that explains my lack of profiency in Lojban. > > Thanks for the vote of confidence %^) > > I think the old-fashioned-ness is it being a DOS program without all the > features of newer interfaces (i.e Windows). So far as I know, no one > has come up with, and proven, a better flash card algorithm than the one > JCB came up. > > Nora and I have occasionally toyed with the idea of rewriting it as an > exercise in learning one of the newer OOP languages. It hasn't worked > its way up the priority list very far because we didn't know anyone cared. > > lojbab > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > > I don't remember whether I said this already or not, but there's a website called Studystack where people can make flashcards. That seems to work pretty well for me for Latin when I take the time to actually go over my flashcards. I also think it's possible to share the flashcard sets, though I haven't specifically tried that. Depending on what else I end up doing, I might have time once finals are over. mu'omi'e skaryzgik. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.