From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Oct 02 16:52:23 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KlXy3-0000S4-0F for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:52:23 -0700 Received: from narnia.blumen-schwarz.de ([80.190.195.21]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KlXxz-0000Ri-BQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:52:22 -0700 Received: from wh28.stw.stud.uni-saarland.de ([134.96.48.59] helo=nicte.localnet) by narnia.blumen-schwarz.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KlXxp-0007Io-9h for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:52:12 +0200 From: Roman Naumann To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: New, more Lojbanic Lojban orthography Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:51:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.1.1; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-00=_L6V5IoxNefBJACd" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810030151.39383.eldrikdo@gmail.com> X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: ------------- Start der SpamAssassin Auswertung --------------- Bei Fragen dazu bitte das Forum life.d.cvmx verwenden! Details der Inhaltsanalyse: (-4.2 Punkte, 5.0 benoetigt) -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Nachricht wurde nur über vertrauenswürdige Rechner weitergeleitet -4.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 0-1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: Nachricht enthält HTML 1.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---------------- Ende der SpamAssassin Auswertung ----------------- X-Spam-Score: 1.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: 12 X-Spam-Bar: + X-archive-position: 14818 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eldrikdo@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --Boundary-00=_L6V5IoxNefBJACd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 03 October 2008 01:33:50 jozis. wrote: > alphabet, I have built up certain expectations about what Latin-alphabet > text ought to look like, and Latin-orthography Lojban looks somewhat > jarring as a result. Your abjad is both prettier and more Lojbanic than the > Latin in my opinion. I agree. Lojban in the Latin alphabet looks ugly, like some bash programming language somewhat. In addition to the beauty aspect, I find it very annoying that I got used to certain sounds of latin glyphs. I habitually confuse the "s" with the "z", as they are that that way in German, or the "c" and "k".. -- mu'o mi'e nam --Boundary-00=_L6V5IoxNefBJACd Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Friday 03 October 2008 01:33:50 jozis. wrote:

> alphabet, I have built up certain expectations about what Latin-alphabet

> text ought to look like, and Latin-orthography Lojban looks somewhat

> jarring as a result. Your abjad is both prettier and more Lojbanic than the

> Latin in my opinion.

I agree. Lojban in the Latin alphabet looks ugly, like some bash programming language somewhat.

In addition to the beauty aspect, I find it very annoying that I got used to certain sounds of latin glyphs. I habitually confuse the "s" with the "z",

as they are that that way in German, or the "c" and "k"..

--

mu'o mi'e nam

--Boundary-00=_L6V5IoxNefBJACd-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.