From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Oct 03 04:00:36 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KliOi-0007mM-Q8 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:00:36 -0700 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KliOg-0007m4-2W for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:00:36 -0700 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so1560496wfa.25 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:00:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=fzMmLdH+WzgCCwx1Vnr7wErvEAPHCRqQYJEYjyBJ3TM=; b=OgM/hb+WooDVGQx1NvNtm4zbzdsui6D91AsRKYt/V7v4dQ6epGR+ixVa6/jul4nnrg a1380ucuovyNKv1sYV8NcU/0nRgoS762MaA7/xkc2b/o8kUi/tkB51YvIjlolbdKiOji 98cOHflnbidPwmv6cTzRw7K1luNyk9aSvU5aI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=h3rmVJD1LyLz/a9ljIsZIw3i3a+ZMCDxPLkL1wfvHoNg5PIk2Q4QVhRvcmqm6KE9EG lK9yawCHZMIpl6nbZmKzyr5ftqLy9js6EdZN6G/Afo9q2DrMTDRXRN1uBAOjw2Htl55Q +Evk0TbjepfXaeBbaqj1EnippcicInqnGcGWk= Received: by 10.142.229.5 with SMTP id b5mr327683wfh.50.1223031633115; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.113.13 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f234f340810030400m4e10b925nba91d9e75519839b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:00:33 +0200 From: "Auke Booij" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: New, more Lojbanic Lojban orthography In-Reply-To: <200810030219.56213.eldrikdo@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30067_13981103.1223031633106" References: <200810030151.39383.eldrikdo@gmail.com> <737b61f30810021701v671de698yd98f203710410ca0@mail.gmail.com> <200810030219.56213.eldrikdo@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14821 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: auke.booij@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_30067_13981103.1223031633106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/3/08, Roman Naumann wrote: > Though, I really think it's very ugly.. > > IMHO it looks even worse than most programming langs.. > > for it lacks the formatting-signs "( )" "{ }" "[ ]" and indentation, > > but still has a clear grouping. Mathematical expressions in Lojban > > are funny to read, if there are cmavo for ( and ).. > but then again, the actual machinecode doesn't contain readable ()[]{} either (except for the "coincidental" cases). everything is a command out there. my $0.02 ------=_Part_30067_13981103.1223031633106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
On 10/3/08, Roman Naumann <eldrikdo@gmail.com> wrote:

Though, I really think it's very ugly..

IMHO it looks even worse than most programming langs..

for it lacks the formatting-signs "( )" "{ }" "[ ]" and indentation,

but still has a clear grouping. Mathematical expressions in Lojban

are funny to read, if there are cmavo for ( and )..

 
but then again, the actual machinecode doesn't contain readable ()[]{} either (except for the "coincidental" cases). everything is a command out there.
 
my $0.02

 
------=_Part_30067_13981103.1223031633106-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.