From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Nov 03 04:16:17 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:16:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KwyLx-0004xC-JQ for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:16:17 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.242]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KwyLt-0004wF-8R for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:16:17 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so2544618rvf.46 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:16:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=eFVMBDBJKcnPZywoBFjcDddQg57F8ECa1jsmR8b+rlA=; b=SUTHHP+vIarFcCy80GDxYCdnaohKxD37/Kdq5L6lyOfJ0c/SZ7gFLMF5dypkyyoSzd y3yyRiduy98KuLd+0L6X7ZntFw/y2u1a0nryxfiptB7aqRvFvfpIAkxECmegxcxVHtfh 70AnQzd/ExEKgzkHZOKhYo53S8siRYI2uziRQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=eHBS4dokpcMcC67vU14BaUHulCFHMb/tsHuKc0xlV4swsF2aF2jxLb66ozqqbASyHi eXgtdKlpirhejsrnu0RD0bGMYAKmu/JRFg2PAlRDKil4/jskP46tk6xl0uZA0qXF/zPM ksUzjnHLs+vUBnBGlIpWHUeYVCaraNuuHsfi0= Received: by 10.141.23.7 with SMTP id a7mr21408rvj.58.1225714572603; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:16:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 04:16:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560811030416x739c8f8dk8c863992bbad0e40@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:16:12 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss. In-Reply-To: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14911 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Chris Capel wrote: > I'm wondering how to handle experimental cmavo in Lojgloss. As I see > it, they probably fall into at least two catogories. > > 1) Drops right into an existing selma'o, like BAI. > 2) Constitutes its own selma'o. > > 1 could be handled pretty straightforwardly without having to change > the parser code, just using some configuration. But 2 would probably > be more difficult to handle. At the extreme it would require changing > the grammar and recompiling the parser. It'd be nice to avoid that. So > how common is case 2? The only example of 2 that comes to mind is zo'oi/la'oi, of selma'o ZOhOI. The rules for selmaho ZOhOI should be just like those for ZO, except "any-word" is replaced by something similar to "zoi-word". In general, introducing a new selmaho is a bad idea, unless very explicit rules are given for it. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.