From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 19 06:48:37 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:48:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L2oM8-0008Do-U8 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:48:37 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.246]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L2oM5-0008DR-Af for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:48:36 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so3744730rvf.46 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:48:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=H2kVk+8Emex3mwBg5SPBK2AHluRHzcfPXwCnAjXaj2I=; b=NM/x9hSF33fU87CszuRnYxDkbefv4G5P89nM9z2TQvEpP+dYYPlUZ9AJG9SM98GyPn flkPNzsHanJUFVyWEF5ppIWw28wz3EFNrZGvPKI2OLTlGfbXiIz5l7vipGMIeFXwSB4k 2Q4x6z3/OH/q5hABnRmUh5yfwRVeNYfYJYHO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=NeVJrFBhl2iEYXaDEUNyEjrF3bYbLr9LkfgwpELcGtYqWsmI4xbTEKfjTS1W5Tw7O1 DL9SIemYcmQopdzV9CqGB88MN3qzB6nXZEs87y0wh2cRyZ9xRwi19ds5J7LIE9s1Ahf7 faAlOyGet6w+9vbxe0SaEM2c9xWpNfXAvhbw8= Received: by 10.141.74.18 with SMTP id b18mr631681rvl.48.1227106112567; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:48:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:48:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560811190648y2242a9e7x52981cb35d43c055@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:48:32 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: more grammar discussion In-Reply-To: <925d17560811190503n795f8ca0yccb161340595b7ee@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811162220l2851d26ai745a0875c3377f9b@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811170334q71b89c65oe6fa6b3aa6e699f9@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811181707q39afadbcsbd0c3bfb61f4f807@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811181728qe052fc8h50431662af8132e4@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811181836h20f19138maf8cdcc22570931@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811190503n795f8ca0yccb161340595b7ee@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 15064 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list There's something odd about this rule: selbri-4 <- selbri-4 joik-jek selbri-5 / selbri-4 joik tag? KE free* selbri-3 KEhE? free* / selbri-5 It's the only rule (ok, together with the "operator" rule which presents the same oddness) where joik is not allowed to alternate with jek or with ek. Why is that? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.