From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 26 15:42:04 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5U1E-0006U5-1w for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:42:04 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.246]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5U1C-0006Tl-6Q for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:42:03 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so722588rvf.46 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:41:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=HEsq9suZ3ftCw84ZiR3HarGUcsDGraNfU5Zw4dH1IrQ=; b=AR3FwsbVDRnwOVTk4DD/M+ZBkTRGmeCV12CISEZMPMLMYtcbDGzk7auZnWPmruk1Ty WDPAiyMvU6ZXNts/+sZgLI4zHTTXHvzRnmMWZbIQNQvwoFp4jlHZ7cpx4VumRIziZrDE tf1e20yMUrhmCceErFF6QQSAPQHiqmi35vaZA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=kkypYw9dOi9+lAr338EKkizx78R/t1hfqg4fM3br9KLKKuJsNQfpEKD80yibeO7kc/ 4t3uVZ8F50fu2tUI/RK5TGIWCMiewEtH+vg5nOarKd4OcoyPF67jlsRcQR+41xFRbhJy on3RI8hBa3qt+p4NJOfur3aZ4IcfJzf+yORCA= Received: by 10.141.76.21 with SMTP id d21mr3142954rvl.34.1227742918794; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:41:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:41:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560811261541w31f1025do5f860fb738902889@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:41:58 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Superfluous {tosmabru} check? In-Reply-To: <20081126231234.GA21340@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081126231234.GA21340@sdf.lonestar.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 15074 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Minimiscience wrote: > Thus, the {tosmabru} test will always > indicate that a {lujvo} of the form "(CVC)* + 'y' + X" does not need any > further hyphens, and so applying the test to such a {lujvo} in the first place > is completely pointless. Is this true, or am I missing something very basic? Consider bab+lab+bla: bablabybla = ba blabybla mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.