From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Nov 26 02:00:40 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:00:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NDb9T-00071f-Ae for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:00:39 -0800 Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NDb9O-0006yr-1f for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:00:38 -0800 Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so457268pwi.26 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:00:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=w2ZT83GPf/J+HuuAnQmAPc2PqtJO9EJWyJLrr0dQYnI=; b=NzGqbE7eFITj/t2x8QZ/u40ultt47FtHnBMvv848ovonOhCbIqejC4Rd8erJucm8rP fvADv8KD7DmUyp3U0P7xWMase5zH20/zA5QfrUt81Zjvskcc9NuWESQQWyMFWsWJXwWb Fba4qKKttTgekv15zsp+XLvZZEspmsoK7Yb9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=lmxCJuVxmDX0dRIKSrnsF+1J+lWYzgneh9pEMBw2hBM3P1SuSFNaAGLcdXYVJ1pBI9 QHONd8/9Ppy46px/uJ8ySqo6KZFtKiuIhb6F9aVB/PCarK1WzRo1FWrLs/1/yDgO8c29 YGfJTd9gT56O14xZVwUDn3VyI3L1RlHpXehbg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.8 with SMTP id d8mr1018810wfa.22.1259229628140; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:00:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Oren Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:00:08 +0800 Message-ID: <27513e550911260200k4e0cc227s9aa20435d851bb83@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: I'm writing a parser To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 16489 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: get.oren@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Woah, should I upgrade to Python 3? I tried running it in 2.6.4 and got tons of errors for function calls like: function(arg=value): and after I regexed them all out, it stopped at a function call claiming that '\n' was invalid syntax ... .i ju'ocu'i ki'a ma Anyhow, it looks like nice clean code! Assuming it runs, what's the biggest challenge right now? mu'o mi'e ku'us On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 14:09, purpleposeidon wrote: > http://github.com/purpleposeidon/zirsam/ > > It needs a ton of work still. For example, dendrography, the > grammar-parsing-bit, doesn't like {oi broda}, and I haven't tested > thaumatology, the magic-word portion, sufficiently. Nor have I tested > the non-standard alphabets. And much more. However, I'd like to draw > attention of its existence outside of IRC. > > My greatest concern right now is parsing valid lojban, not not parsing > invalid lojban. My motivation for writing this is that I'd like to > make a semantics engine. I believe Nick Nicholas (?) wrote something > like that using camxes, tho I haven't used it. > > mu'o mi'e djeims > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.