From jjllambias@gmail.com Thu Dec 03 10:32:23 2009 Received: from mail-yw0-f187.google.com ([209.85.211.187]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGGTN-0005sx-KF for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:32:22 -0800 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so1684565ywh.2 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:32:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sh9Pv+3J+jkmerUWt9r/4A2gH603U1qX5UHeCdxO9Co=; b=iAkg4/Si3hNof+K6Z+anYPK/UekyLJ3xWrWRkzxb2/hSIqi4w/QUrByH4GOdPjF7o2 /MZDHPVi/5r4+9svX53nwAl0haP7PH4SLw3WIFnj2S0jKneVum168o8kR2vr81l/hN7j LQxilYBgAb7EbWBVHLSyCose+bfcKqGAaDfPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eWi5ha+DVoiN9VNkdmfjwtOr5MosQ9GdhtvYC2LxjMwemFBWV3nwUhT3nuqp5WX/w/ LsOaNPOk+uiRm96l9gsHRP3V52WaMfYiMWGc8cLQKJ99UPt2HgyR3t7Y86a37M7ar/m0 H3S08xkA5Z9vPl14/ABN6M6kmSXLQnJjhgIyE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.150.17 with SMTP id x17mr2982956agd.57.1259864753565; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:25:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:25:53 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560912031025v756adb41x909ab4dc11f28fe@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: what's a du'u? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Daniel Brockman wrote: > > A separate but related question is whether bridi1 corresponds to du'u1 > or du'u2. =A0The gimste pretty much explicitly says that bridi1 is a > string of text, and so corresponds to du'u2, but I think we should > redefine bridi1 to instead correspond to du'u2. =A0We had a discussion > about this on IRC as recently as yesterday. See also: http://www.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9511/msg00557.html Why 14 years (almost to the day) later questions like this one are still up in the air is one of the mysteries of Lojban. mu'o mi'e xorxes