From selckiku@gmail.com Sun Dec 06 20:04:14 2009 Received: from mail-iw0-f186.google.com ([209.85.223.186]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NHUpX-0004GD-FH for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:04:14 -0800 Received: by iwn16 with SMTP id 16so2789885iwn.26 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:04:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/svskO8H0FoAOIETK8p1sxsEB++TTSI4db+ghZyG/dc=; b=WqLvv9XU03K4LNthOUEQBo84bH7LAOZswG3ve/ArZVFIf0UlcFoL9XGyFFEf5hdtwh 1DUKOpt/PPgvHBlTr94aSahbT1ZnADcFrEFDEhr89CIJA6RL2L3EyBDxh6J81GeSp5Pa YHhAwlS8lL4yri+kK6CSDo2HC1h2RWbua22Xw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NGX7xmtLpV1MCnsS5BRHjKFiwMDCT0ouPHST7AKDK+FjG9HfgYaUvHx7NRANb8gLPg aHgFx7oYuWVfLCeCH81MgYyUm7qJM0XJSMgEeGhBbpPHDwe09cLHMWP4hwtLU/uT9vu3 Drn1C/LxUfVK2IiPILw2MGxQXU7nE8aZTEcao= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.125.19 with SMTP id w19mr3485975ibr.8.1260158644995; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:04:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <40b71af30912061952r51d51fbfg74bb354f057bd96e@mail.gmail.com> References: <40b71af30912061952r51d51fbfg74bb354f057bd96e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:04:04 -0500 Message-ID: <425e4ac20912062004v18747d71t47a0dc8fbe59ba14@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] cmavo for 'realized potential'? From: Stela Selckiku To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Frank wrote: > coi coi do > =A0=A0 =A0I know nu'o is the cmavo for 'unrealized potential'. =A0Does An= yone know > of a cmavo for 'realized potential'? =A0Perhaps I missed it? zo pu'i > ki'e je'e > mi'e xuinkrbin. mi'e la stela selckiku