From get.oren@gmail.com Sun Dec 06 20:06:15 2009 Received: from mail-px0-f201.google.com ([209.85.216.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NHUrS-0005eh-Pj for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:06:15 -0800 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so393614pxi.2 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:06:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=taUTsdOZudHR+WDTiqHUIDG8gCM9IAdSQCClI6cK4k8=; b=gITw2pX0SEQFdnYzPv1pcH4RA3sgCAEmrwYa6blxfMFuo0/rbVkdLoE6hVv6JSXxdM qsp+s7zj27D9iWMdVLBlfmLJGibmJa/0xC5MDnwJY7F5fJ1loi5oq/MdoxnNpuOQu5kx ev3l0mJEzpnzIcji0sh43vF7nSI3wwc0fm6iQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=EqMQhsTtXtLTmUTTVPAmMtCNq7oxYTKReA2zwNbnbPXGy/L0qMjTfdqwjOylmhYoKo JEnnA3VKL1x5+JBjWfhx7k73XrbUFeK1O0GigDMVtObfSWVk49rtqs7qETkOhNPQxcls BqE7552yTR/GdwgIJQNvct3qs4VJ/Ro6Ze1AY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.21.36 with SMTP id y36mr674517wfi.211.1260158764153; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:06:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <27513e550912062003q28fa193bjc8bcb5a6f41f2211@mail.gmail.com> References: <40b71af30912061952r51d51fbfg74bb354f057bd96e@mail.gmail.com> <27513e550912062003q28fa193bjc8bcb5a6f41f2211@mail.gmail.com> From: Oren Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:05:44 +0800 Message-ID: <27513e550912062005x2be11b0t2db809130967d8ff@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] cmavo for 'realized potential'? To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cdeb7f7a7a047a1b93da --00504502cdeb7f7a7a047a1b93da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 wow. i didnt even read your post! sorry... My minimalist instinct would say 'realized potentil' would just be asserting that something has happened. that is, indicate past tense or something. mu'o mi'e ku'us On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:03, Oren wrote: > Here's an entry from the official gismu list: > > nu'o > nu'o can but has not > modal aspect: can but has not; unrealized potential > > [http://www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/gismu.txt] > > mu'o mi'e ku'us > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:52, Frank wrote: > >> coi >> I know nu'o is the cmavo for 'unrealized potential'. Does Anyone know >> of a cmavo for 'realized potential'? Perhaps I missed it? >> >> ki'e >> mi'e xuinkrbin. >> > > --00504502cdeb7f7a7a047a1b93da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
wow. i didnt even read your post! sorry...

My mini= malist instinct would say 'realized potentil' would just be asserti= ng that something has happened. that is, indicate past tense or something.<= br>
mu'o mi'e ku'us

On Mon, D= ec 7, 2009 at 12:03, Oren <get.oren@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's an entry from the official gismu list:
=
nu'o          
nu'o can but has not                           modal aspect: can but has not; unrealized potential
[http:= //www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/gismu.txt]

mu'o mi'e ku'us


On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:52, Frank <frank= dmartinez@gmail.com> wrote:
coi
=A0=A0 =A0I know nu'o is the cmavo for 'unrealized potentia= l'. =A0Does Anyone know of a cmavo for 'realized potential'? = =A0Perhaps I missed it?

ki'e
mi'= e xuinkrbin.


--00504502cdeb7f7a7a047a1b93da--