From craigbdaniel@gmail.com Sun Jan 03 09:23:29 2010
Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>)
	id 1NRUAo-0000du-AO
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:23:29 -0800
Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so9957070bwz.26
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:23:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=ISh4QXTA8Q5I8J3f5TNP8468C2KGsEKQ+/Au9pkIDO4=;
        b=c3BKdyR3sca0vglptkSQAAKEnuMdOsZAMA9qE74hPjKoeU5ZKOj3vF82uuRq+QjtTy
         XdIfClIxeSZ2Cci0wcfRQv5ngyyrwHafQMBMipMtpcgczFMTBYGwnNwQ1YAxoVsc6j2o
         480HF5Itye6Az04t41sM9mMZL7vg7XQ1Ksfi0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Ga1la+jnX6eMJfeVZ1B90rIucbVqVKdg47UhMFPC9J65C0Qms6CELqlbkrcYiXusTJ
         jnrSAN9VPZ0mAaEuK4XjqbMDYqmhcaRpREGZOvLXiVP9dtPcEQFuE8tU5cxhFAl4eK0i
         aEw3Y8sXd4UxwRPBuert1FxLcvoqyCx59dSQ4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.33.135 with SMTP id h7mr8102946bkd.28.1262539399784; Sun, 
	03 Jan 2010 09:23:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201001031213.58222.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <op.u5ydyzrne0p7z8@kobra> <201001031213.58222.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:23:18 -0500
Message-ID: <55b258c21001030923s270d4fc0sa8e9b8180db6c31e@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Initial impression
From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> The thing about Lojban orthography that looks strangest to me is the capital
> letters for stress. I think that accented letters look better. That the
> orthography was devised before Unicode is, I think, the explanation for using
> caps.
>

Agreed. But like commas they aren't found in anything natively
Lojbanic, and I've been handwriting them with accents (either acutes
or macrons depending on mood) for the past bunch of years.