From craigbdaniel@gmail.com Sun Jan 03 19:17:13 2010
Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>)
	id 1NRdRO-0002L4-28
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:17:13 -0800
Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so10125692bwz.26
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:17:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=jWrv7wdAMDooaRZh/ov58dfQnm+6b4v7JyeZeuR7bSs=;
        b=afhIDH+xeiyh3IE0ZvPRv66SescvFARzqlHBndjygDK1xJ8zrYRnCe2BauIoqaXLU7
         1Oq842rJ+5ms5cNcyEPJlCfOVZBORfqPZKTokne4u8uIkwGLcPDq2qubWTkyLJfaJ/3N
         MkaBCsICGpkChT13rfyhjLxZylreRP+LzuwxU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=d0u3MTkAcip5gwpVFFJnAvzFZ2VmpSoRQdcSYONns4gJYj0m87HnKQGv1NIybgdF3c
         UnLn4iOZcDzXu5NbiUtadWQVdvUHnBRfj++98fzn/1/eMiV9RhIk//sAE+xZBLl3L/nh
         d+IGtTCNa+UoruOTXb++gp5nbSGjak+QkcGe0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.24.84 with SMTP id u20mr1198643bkb.164.1262575022910; Sun, 
	03 Jan 2010 19:17:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201001032021.39737.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <201001030128.32544.phma@phma.optus.nu>
	 <20100104002924.GY8278@nvg.org>
	 <55b258c21001031637m63926acfg7fc5c74fd27379e4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <201001032021.39737.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:17:02 -0500
Message-ID: <55b258c21001031917s15eafff6n31d8a03b92e83c11@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: trick question
From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> You're supposed to think it means "Chechen", but it doesn't. I'm not sure what
> the Lojban for "Chechen" is, but I'm thinking "noxtino". ("noxcino" is
> invalid because of "xc".)
>

I tried to look up tirkce as a lujvo before realizing it was
ill-formed, so I was already thinking lujvo and didn't get fooled by
tcetcena; otherwise it probably would've worked.