From jjllambias@gmail.com Mon Jan 04 12:00:55 2010 Received: from mail-yw0-f186.google.com ([209.85.211.186]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRt6h-00007f-Fy for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:00:55 -0800 Received: by ywh16 with SMTP id 16so14138331ywh.25 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:00:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+EfyUNhYBEn3RXmO1vRGOiDjCrBgZzFBLBGIyGvEJV0=; b=vG5OkFv+bSdvPxrBHo3uPhk5An3L54xXZwmhThnALjdefuIhnyUIrryuFn1/e4CpV5 2aPsDpRL7WSRZs0FqFDY+4jPSS/knxyH4Ij0z8iBqAnlFii/ZpU8zuHKyTeqid1SDvSl Yx6bRuxZD3htq3LJweAT6LJ4rD+OPvCIXr3Io= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=H2APycJFl7bjyra8WrWnA4IBZLhK1+CUt+XRIxIXcqJJ4eE4CHwwm6EhJD68q9pOWR rZovlQUyn3xTlvGFmlPfbQvkNqfNnBbIvp4EEMMCI4RDlQIY8NY7hoJ37z8w7prSS8/Z zR+SmxQHT7AXbGeJoaqnG+Ceh1PP03wVzPzYs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.2.27 with SMTP id 27mr9337015agb.17.1262635244590; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:00:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9301001041148w20b0c4a8l61328a296fc99015@mail.gmail.com> References: <425e4ac21001031952t22834298oa24977c0eef72d35@mail.gmail.com> <425e4ac21001032050h48991b70rdf63974aab3da6a9@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561001040956n33e7c7edn30558cc45710a3e6@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561001041114q730db24w765a865db4fa6bb1@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301001041148w20b0c4a8l61328a296fc99015@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:00:44 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17561001041200y5e53b993jf3b32d299da7499e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Initial impression From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > hmmm, maybe I'm misunderstanding your explanation xorxes but what exactly > would be the difference between {zoi .gy blah blah .gy} and {zo'oi .blah > blah.} where basically "." is the automatic delimiter "word" like ".gy" was > in the {zoi...} phrase? The difference is just that "." is not recognized as a word (and a space " " would do just as well, BTW). What I'm saying is that for ZOhOI to work, we would be required to treat the pause/space as a new kind of (pseudo-)word, so that the syntax stage, not just the morphology stage as now, needs to be made aware of pause/spaces. mu'o mi'e xorxes