From jjllambias@gmail.com Tue Jan 12 12:55:34 2010 Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUnlx-00073w-8k for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:55:34 -0800 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so16128182bwz.26 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:55:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2cPHwVeQRmbPJ0eUMAiw2vVmoSzPYY22YrQReIQG2Wk=; b=NJwINiTOago1MIIdV3uN0U1pb6b8CGto6xAHxsqtJitPJrZAZRbqBf6++3D0AP51TW KuFPqNKunDpuZ/CbN2e1malNOxHCNumFwCLmc78Wsxfwm9YP5iVCraiE1IM2uAvUBXEQ J3Vn0LB5KxCqfMtonnn83qGbPRasMZH4sWPaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TVhKT/JCvHpnoowEbgzDgaW33Bj0W+HuUckWT1gpdma42O3QQzN5oAB3nE09aIf+7o mxkXz2z02CQ2QC0sCEp85S/YZOkcSME9zTc+mj2pj2LkSVNuSkh9Z3JoT1/lM40C6/+T IJmRNmBsth3Fyl5Ha02wjCrnPh+Lx4rDXx/Nk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.20.142 with SMTP id f14mr5824877bkb.64.1263329722126; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:55:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9301001121232t715e8e69n265381f070ded8ce@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9301001121232t715e8e69n265381f070ded8ce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:55:21 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17561001121255x23dd594bw894bf1a867ec6edc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] shifting in tanru From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > I looked around in the CLL but couldn't find an answer. =A0I remember at = one > point reading/hearing that in {da broda brode de di} the form is that {da= } > fills the x1 place of broda and {de} and {di} fill the x2 and x3 places > respectively of {brode}. =A0Am I right so far in this? No, you are probably thinking of "da broda co brode de di". In "da broda brode de di", "da" fills the x1 of brode. mu'o mi'e xorxes