From jjllambias@gmail.com Wed Jan 13 04:29:22 2010
Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1NV2La-0001wc-Tw
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:29:22 -0800
Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so16525652bwz.26
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:29:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=X3XBEPggOuUqYHyrtHuE+OwtUbxZzWfyhXkI+IHXB4E=;
        b=GbuIToY8BzQ2uE1gTzJL+Oo9pUE9VJmURwjv5JSpexU8ActxZ7bZLgifc0cTDOPtu+
         fFR/2D20957+9r79u5wlZaLycYhxPafCmW+k6uEXaqWj0R6bdzyPP1JbCdwPEuTqzMDZ
         w8GaCh7+M4EBEWr74bDryl3SwDE2TGOk/j9Io=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=h21AWio6OmXvbUa6xBXftcmadjG57NM7xTWbiKDYNxCWajFYTckm/N+lSeiJY4l0Tx
         Gcq+v+mKnObqCVs9PJiZm8q+m4oQAQv5erIEwyb5qu27zmznbKOTR5p8C6RN3wskpfKQ
         NU++FOv4aUr445ZsJToUVqTcsNGyObyPieAGM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.163.68 with SMTP id z4mr6900012bkx.86.1263385745655; Wed, 
	13 Jan 2010 04:29:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201001122213.19312.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <5715b9301001121232t715e8e69n265381f070ded8ce@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5715b9301001121321x3878127cwb56e277b8878756f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <925d17561001121405o460c9b12k6decf80e3a044387@mail.gmail.com>
	 <201001122213.19312.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:29:05 -0300
Message-ID: <925d17561001130429h731200edsd3b29fd0e5ffdc0d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: shifting in tanru
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> So in "mi lo nu kargau le vorme lo nu darxi ri troci co klama le bartu", "le
> bartu" is x2 of "klama" even though there are three arguments before "troci"?

Yes, but I think you wanted: "mi lo nu kargau le vorme kei lo nu darxi
ri cu troci co klama le bartu", otherwise there aren't three arguments
before troci.

mu'o mi'e xorxes