From jimr1603@gmail.com Mon Feb 22 12:52:55 2010 Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NjfGq-0006Z9-76 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:52:54 -0800 Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2so323452pwi.40 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:52:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lNj5QZ+T4q/A+ihjH8UC6k0iGJBfb2FRT7OcO65Y+2s=; b=i8e9gZ3U+5vzSdqCNM7IlowA3QK+7fCUkowGIoIfUFDIunAMfVq39o+w6vmyQ9Dq5f p1fYpQskTCESwhEKBk1Sv192JB+fIl+HhYuEv3uFlMcjQnHGJfmQdDxGS7Jvl7dcgzqH Ki5cTJcYNNb4f0PV/eW9bKCo1z0EcRTza6BkM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MXaoeRuQvfaBSbWile4+dPI1lN6yifItFydeUdC65pDQiKMPxodyzIRx7/xd2qaSpb anaAgwFCDnMsi5yAWA1f/xx4200B5DkcaS74LaIBzY6mea5OH2K8bDzFOd7KuI2+EpC6 6V8XRGsnkoneXFkpNi2ScAAeYuPkCHs1CGUJg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.23.20 with SMTP id a20mr9177658rvj.193.1266871962204; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:52:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9301002221034v6b3b6e7atdc7de3a75e8f7ed8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050419104222.27410.qmail@web32110.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5715b9301002221034v6b3b6e7atdc7de3a75e8f7ed8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:52:42 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: To be polite in lojban. From: james riley To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1a3f04879d10480369dbe --000e0cd1a3f04879d10480369dbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 They behave differently. {e'o} is a UI, {pe'u} a COI. On 22 February 2010 18:34, Luke Bergen wrote: > they way I understand it {.e'o} is more specific. I seem to remember > somewhere in the CLL that pretty much anything becomes more polite if you > add {pe'u} to it. Whereas {.e'o} is only for if you're requesting that the > listener do something. > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Geoffrey Beresford < > gfberesford@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What's the difference between {pe'u} and {.e'o} for "please" ? >> >> >> > --000e0cd1a3f04879d10480369dbe Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable They behave differently. {e'o} is a UI, {pe'u} a COI.

On 22 February 2010 18:34, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
they way I unders= tand it {.e'o} is more specific. =A0I seem to remember somewhere in the= CLL that pretty much anything becomes more polite if you add {pe'u} to= it. =A0Whereas {.e'o} is only for if you're requesting that the li= stener do something.


On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Geoffrey B= eresford <gfberesford@gmail.com> wrote:
What's the difference between {pe'u} and {.e'o} =A0for "pl= ease" ?




--000e0cd1a3f04879d10480369dbe--