Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com ([209.85.219.223]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NfJo1-0004XX-DT for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:09:09 -0800 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so47501ewy.4 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:08:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z3suSypYjPnU/zc1YQCyFLKGTCxdIHpffV87OEMj85E=; b=ldYALOS46FupJ1cJ0dGeV7vihZ0kIk6paGH3f3sz4RKuSEP7p6byyDm2kEKcwd3DYx pDEch6y4K5/QHjzaLRGRZ3rr81F+lofz7jC/kMz1VTxa1eLQwBAchsGOxIbjVgMASjWL cIpsxdG0VKCYGtgSfJqwj6ho0pIeoQbGO0NyE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fPCWLAMpPfxDDeeg24JjUhTrWzhXOKbqeBBJctmbrvTz/8Bi1gdUL0skJG2Uh0BTEl uSSQdqI7UMRFyAJxlBHAKpj6WU9X2B8J0R+OdHMqPi6LSSmSC+krZzbwmnO+2ay5Ltss vDycgTaQStTJXsCoGibThnfpjob/jnwa16Ea0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.100.7 with SMTP id w7mr723720ebn.23.1265836138626; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:08:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201002101549.09607.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <1f1080831002101203r45ca1281o4e3a59a4443264a5@mail.gmail.com> <20100210201640.GA22591@sdf.lonestar.org> <5715b9301002101226t255abfa6y7f717354761d6147@mail.gmail.com> <201002101549.09607.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:08:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1f1080831002101308g10071f3coc9edb6ea209898aa@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: se du'u? From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d03762fee8047f457126 Content-Length: 2079 Lines: 61 --00504502d03762fee8047f457126 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In Luke's last sentence he says "...se cu klama mi". Can you do that? I thought it would need to be "cu se klama mi" mu'omi'e latros. On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 15:26:37 Luke Bergen wrote: > > Interesting. du'u vs se du'u always kind of confused me. > > > > So, would {mi cusku lo se du'u mi klama lo zarci} be equal to both {mi > > cusku lu mi klama lo zarci} and {mi cusku lu lo zarci se cu klama mi} > since > > they both represent the same bridi but in different ways? > > Yes. It can also be equivalent to "mi cusku zoi sy. voy al mercado .sy". > > Pierre > -- > li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa > > > > --00504502d03762fee8047f457126 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In Luke's last sentence he says "...se cu klama mi". Can you = do that? I thought it would need to be "cu se klama mi"

mu= 'omi'e latros.

On Wed, Feb 10, 20= 10 at 3:49 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 15:26:37 Luke Bergen wrote:
> Interesting. =A0du'u vs se du'u always kind of confused me. >
> So, would {mi cusku lo se du'u mi klama lo zarci} be equal to both= {mi
> cusku lu mi klama lo zarci} and {mi cusku lu lo zarci se cu klama mi} = since
> they both represent the same bridi but in different ways?

Yes. It can also be equivalent to "mi cusku zoi sy. voy al merca= do .sy".

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa




--00504502d03762fee8047f457126--