Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1NieMO-0003fn-IZ
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:42:24 -0800
Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so553571bwz.26
        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:42:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=LOI0EK1MU5iaHnSNZEkuch0F6ube6YnNuSMAT3TdhL8=;
        b=TTl2VVIn2KCKnsLitOvPpOk2/eTie1ShY9O/pB0OEKiTqqCnXgIzm4Zow1NOw2nusp
         95ro9YUsHCMS3ew2LESbu4exB8A1Wx/BebduSoIfFK33vZm4U8u8W4gXi3+aT8nggj6A
         zPtAhlFGtts/SNG+wTdVIeeNDdPMkd9OoCaMI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=OGW7t4gQYVZQn/73NEgzpbkm1PYMNDN1daISBHM3BbdiIZCDHDBwcgRZWFmtOeH0UO
         EwkO8sldFFiSXbzg7t8gWImTlJOsDaa/xqw9ka8j2xgm4GPnji1OE+a+tjT/54I/lnp1
         4E+Adn5vNrhIjtmBL9sWc21T+0OR2HUFLBijs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.150.81 with SMTP id x17mr2466324bkv.200.1266630129430; 
	Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100220012818.GH19917@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <1f1080831002181721w425a462dpd6cdae84a97b4d0f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100219014246.GY19917@digitalkingdom.org>
	 <1f1080831002181825s174b3e2dicc8251571742e6dd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1f1080831002191639m14515b3fibe33935505caade@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100220012818.GH19917@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:42:09 -0300
Message-ID: <925d17561002191742n5396d949y90b34a6df6a4676e@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Not needing terminators
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 356
Lines: 10

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> =A0nu'e le preti be fi mi na dukse lo ka nandu do

Yes, "nu'e" is much better than "nupre" for making rather than
reporting a promise. But it has to be "nu'e do'u" or "nu'e do". Almost
all COI's should be in UI, but unfortunately they're in COI.

mu'o mi'e xorxes