Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com ([209.85.218.211]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NgO0c-0002PJ-TD for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:50:34 -0800 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2923941bwz.33 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:50:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xCNVOf1nnHlFoBoCoLeq0R0mEsQ/o6TKUU9tW3EJTEY=; b=WK4758W8EnnfBTDVQDVjLQRI6CD+XwIB5IqHhWLmNr8/Osk+3i047o1HGAMe74VE7Q bS4zKzDyvrR4i7iVBFaK5hJyW1UyA5/Or1jTz/bTSnBcLsyn6Qzr0ddCIYlO+mK2LAmf wLu2x1MWlhcu/BSIORXvitLqvO5VaQ46qdVx0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YReIcNBwRacSEB1xaI2qRlsctgI9+XyxqsptQ5KlUDYXQoP2HTexoxLbMl2W1KYfwd v/22N9m17WhSbCRGb1s8Un48QA+oPoM2QmmSFc82ZcvmURgJBgZogTMMtn4182mlliBd Adlijn+Do9SzYpDtkSXw5SR7smk9BVBcc6DjE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.15.150 with SMTP id k22mr1927300bka.161.1266090623441; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:50:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <702226df1002130739k9738a55t8439e02cae71a2bf@mail.gmail.com> References: <218950.62113.qm@web46104.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <425e4ac21002081956jb0e0de5n98a1a5446c4f7609@mail.gmail.com> <201002090214.40868.phma@phma.optus.nu> <702226df1002090821m1703c5a8l569467a229bb024@mail.gmail.com> <4B768767.1030503@perpetuum-immobile.de> <702226df1002130739k9738a55t8439e02cae71a2bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:50:23 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17561002131150r284130cfg857a0d535aabca30@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking! From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1605 Lines: 33 On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jon "Top Hat" Jones wrote: > > Of course all {cmevla} are {cmene}, but not all {cmene} are {cmevla}. I would rather say all cmevla can be used as cmene, but not all cmene need be or consist of cmevla. Comparing cmevla and cmene is like comparing apples and desserts. All apples can be eaten for dessert, but not all desserts need be or consist of apples. (Not all apples are actually eaten for dessert, and not all cmevla are actually used as cmene.) "cmevla" is a word category. Lojban has three word categories: cmavo, cmevla, and brivla. Or, if you prefer to split the brivla category, it has five word categories: cmavo, cmevla, gismu, lujvo, and fu'ivla. That's where the concept of cmevla fits in, it is a category of word form. What can be a bit confusing sometimes is that in Lojban word form is highly correlated with word function. So all words in the cmevla category have the same syntactic function, and all words in the brivla category have the same syntactic function. In contrast, the words in the cmavo category have all sorts of different syntactic functions. "cmene" is a function category. Words with cmevla form are the archetypical words that can be used as cmene, because those words can't be used for much else, but all words in the brivla category can be used as cmene too, and cmene don't need to consist of single words. Any string of cmevla can also be used as a cmene, and any selbri can be used as a cmene, so that a cmene could in fact consist of cmavo only, e.g. "pa moi" can be used as a cmene. mu'o mi'e xorxes