From phma@phma.optus.nu Sun Mar 14 06:08:31 2010 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NqnYP-0000ye-Jj for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:08:30 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=8-l5iln9EJwA:10 a=ORa4HqFjfvEA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=nT6jG_XyKBh4GmKMKZQA:9 a=FUdqkBewZxc9glGm3RMnx7b-nB0A:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 71.71.198.100 Received: from [71.71.198.100] ([71.71.198.100:55395] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 38/10-23425-1CFDC9B4; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:08:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F064E72E for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:08:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: A different way to do the flashcards (was Re: Re: cusku =?utf-8?q?=09-_say_or?= express?) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:08:13 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <925d17561003120510w5268cea2sdbf61cc89932839d@mail.gmail.com> <5a3750121003140019s6b201b2p77168c0b74a67139@mail.gmail.com> <20100314093418.GJ25330@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20100314093418.GJ25330@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201003140908.14683.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Sunday 14 March 2010 05:34:19 Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Since I don't read Russian, which is what I'm guessing that is, I'm > only half getting your point; I see the format but I don't > understand the content. An English example would be helpful. [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [75.180.132.123 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] On Sunday 14 March 2010 05:34:19 Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Since I don't read Russian, which is what I'm guessing that is, I'm > only half getting your point; I see the format but I don't > understand the content. An English example would be helpful. The second word is "text" and the third is "auditorium" (actually "auditorii", which is the Latin genitive, but I'm not sure what that would be in Russian). The first is a prefix meaning "out" plus a verb meaning "says". On Sunday 14 March 2010 07:43:48 Lindar Greenwood wrote: > The script is called "Cyrillic" and it's used for writing a large number of > Slavic languages, not just Russian. Also used for several Turkic languages, several Caucasian languages, some Finno-Ugric languages, and some others like Chukchi (which I call "luorvetla" in Lojban, after the endonym). If I think something's Russian and it isn't, though, it's more likely to be Bulgarian than Russian's close relative Ukrainian or Belarusian. Pierre -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci