From mturniansky@gmail.com Thu Mar 04 06:53:47 2010
Received: from mail-pz0-f179.google.com ([209.85.222.179])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mturniansky@gmail.com>)
	id 1NnCQn-0002q5-Pc
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:53:46 -0800
Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so371333pzk.25
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:53:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=600bewAnorZvpZBbAspwCUZoKGESe78M0Nh03zcnkYU=;
        b=g8TkdhBD/qQt1sDKJ1+yDVFBG9yzIL14YQto/8X4rlqzXIcRRQ0p8Hhtt2REvbAW0R
         JTe17LkcEQbKuwrlbCWcE13QC2PjhZhAoj3u/N7GPmEJ7qHw3qA/PP2ckSE73EIOmvAY
         Qyr1xpLRwpvNAYrt1Iw/tS0sFdbF5Npcjfcts=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=OW2loalKVxf/wOiwIAegJiEwZfdlyhYknTSwxlRk1dpUtZSKVg7t3oRMf88HBNP7uQ
         jwiR4iR4gFBoVObEoqnFdDHZdwrDmgFXsFhJ52CDJabe3K8jWjYNkbvDkJq6M/WzWffJ
         pW43RUmkNgtBo+VNIB3/0czfu2qRzmMrgG6Ys=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.9.3 with SMTP id 3mr5500346wfi.237.1267714415111; Thu, 04 
	Mar 2010 06:53:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <395141.17119.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <395141.17119.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:53:35 -0500
Message-ID: <96f789a61003040653h3cbf33fbn82c24ece8e63ec22@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Fw: bridi tail negation
From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:39 AM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> coi ro do
>
> I asked this question on lojba-beginners btu nobody responded.
> Can someone here please answer it?
>

  Actually, you never left this question on lojban-beginners.


> I've just translated
>
> "It wasn't much fun sitting up=C2=A0there in their tree house not speakin=
g.
> "
> as
>
> {.i na'e se zanfri fa=C2=A0lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda gi'enai tavla}
>
> But suppose I had left it=C2=A0as:
> =C2=A0{.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda=C2=A0gi'e=C2=A0na=
=C2=A0tavla}?
>
> Would the negation have covered the whole bridi or just the=C2=A0bridi ta=
il?
>

  My belief is that it would also just negate the tail.  More
problematic to me is a na in front of the first selbri.   The CLL
doesn't unfortunately cover these cases.

                      --gejyspa