From 3JcewSwQNBugZRWKZRWK.YZdec.XeVYTLKXQYYQVOQbYeZc.MYW@groups.bounces.google.com Mon Mar 29 08:29:07 2010 Received: from mail-qy0-f139.google.com ([209.85.221.139]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3JcewSwQNBugZRWKZRWK.YZdec.XeVYTLKXQYYQVOQbYeZc.MYW@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1NwGtg-00038S-SW for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:29:05 -0700 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4sf18351659qyk.27 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=5YDTxbBKR9RqZEqNJ/IYZkl21NNXikLZpdIOYrbJBJE=; b=uyrrr8DGbmL/3qgepCm25jKg7/VUnrm4UO6sLd/nYxlK7hfzwyiT0KkNONrbkriNON VLtziElmVGvin5ltgiD38llTeu+wwV8773I/SJH2SdnRpZuluvW2LVG92IkuqxrxNb8G fkF/XrN407KQ/Ki1M/By6leUsktETRX9S0ITc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; b=FVch5AcCP1BXAKBNKjNzEDrMWmHwWw4HC46Th663+oZtYaUrv4iRX7X7pcqQ5R5+nI smBkrkYtCHpVSHllnV4cJxNqVAPL5xEZCL/Iiss6gFbGbY0x4pZsgaNhNSGDctPxcJRH 0ApKY7O2A2puxc67Wk4nYt7hCEvjICBoWOqzY= Received: by 10.224.69.158 with SMTP id z30mr243906qai.23.1269876517098; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:28:37 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.72.35 with SMTP id k35ls4752838qaj.2.p; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.41.138 with SMTP id o10mr627229qae.12.1269876515464; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.41.138 with SMTP id o10mr627228qae.12.1269876515442; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si531098qyk.13.2010.03.29.08.28.35; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.123; X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ORa4HqFjfvEA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=0JU1s3hlHhBj9djTuU4A:9 a=dTPtWgWIVWPGEdFdAPw5Aa-F3n8A:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 71.71.198.100 Received: from [71.71.198.100] ([71.71.198.100:52126] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id D7/0C-19488-227C0BB4; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:28:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35C43EF0 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:28:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban: You're Doing it Worng Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:28:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <702226df1003290711v11a9e957h537d99b637f40414@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <702226df1003290711v11a9e957h537d99b637f40414@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201003291128.29901.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.123 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/ae71ea92dbbfd5b1 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/436b5479927e0921 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 29 March 2010 10:11:09 Jonathan Jones wrote: > All in favour of changing the definition of minli from > x1 is x2 non-metric long distance units* with subunits x3 **in standard x4* > to > *x1 is x2 non-metric long distance units in standard x3 with subunits x4* > *?* > * > * > And, continuing in the spirit of the proposal, does anyone else have an > issue they feel needs to be addressed? I am in favor, and would also like clarification of what goes in the subunits place: a furlong, a number of furlongs, or something else. Also "mitre" is the only measurement gismu which has a direction in x3 and the only measurement gismu other than "minli" which has the standard somewhere other than x3. Pierre -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.