From jjllambias@gmail.com Thu Mar 04 09:28:15 2010
Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1NnEqJ-0004qx-6I
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:28:15 -0800
Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so3143401fxm.26
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:28:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=OWu2QmXH1oyxRIEztgBUuHRZbig2fwvNnZGbz7CSm0Y=;
        b=it5ybOhb03Ef17S6qtBfDyIiHqnwp4R0k8vkmN1A0OmABA7Ce4tKfxiGzmgLvD73yK
         kvXw4JZsyhCxhR5uUq0FOlHR1xLOsF6NarAUHtWkJFMlPI++vL4hsFDy7Ph9itufmDEQ
         cQwglB6afj1CLqSDa+UkdLJYurl7CMltlHG6g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=WsML6cdrdu5Sseb7bc3Q2IOkKdgNMubS7TGL/3/osNeBo+j3YSDKfZQfbfPcszjEsU
         duETLvH6Z9vNMGL859U1m5uA19OipzN18eZw8AweIOXibFZwxtNmMli41m3l3D7cSbD4
         BbxlS4xJGfxIF0v0Z76FbSLBp951IlecpwIp0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.28.156 with SMTP id m28mr5751837fac.41.1267723684024; Thu, 
	04 Mar 2010 09:28:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <96f789a61003040653h3cbf33fbn82c24ece8e63ec22@mail.gmail.com>
References: <395141.17119.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
	 <96f789a61003040653h3cbf33fbn82c24ece8e63ec22@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:28:03 -0300
Message-ID: <925d17561003040928r5d2d85efma8db985509ffbadf@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Fw: bridi tail negation
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:39 AM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>> =A0{.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda=A0gi'e=A0na=A0tavla}=
?
>>
>> Would the negation have covered the whole bridi or just the=A0bridi tail=
?
>
> =A0My belief is that it would also just negate the tail. =A0More
> problematic to me is a na in front of the first selbri. =A0 The CLL
> doesn't unfortunately cover these cases.

It is clear from the formal grammar that the parsing is:

   (na tavla) gi'e (zutse ne'i le ricyzda)

i.e. the same as for:

   ge (na tavla) gi (zutse ne'i le ricyzda)

mu'o mi'e xorxes