From 3UxyySwoJBm0UUWWLXMTLdRXLTW.NZXWZUMLYRZZRWPRcZfad.NZX@groups.bounces.google.com Tue Mar 30 08:44:50 2010 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3UxyySwoJBm0UUWWLXMTLdRXLTW.NZXWZUMLYRZZRWPRcZfad.NZX@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1NwdcU-0001mL-3f for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:50 -0700 Received: by vws3 with SMTP id 3sf4741109vws.16 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=lIRz3FT4iWXDfmNH8iRvWUn2hyzT7VVoP3PH1KpVeEA=; b=3OSTYCBbae2YN5hiklPnssz7he1sLHzpbJ+CkIyo3rfZtxiSfcOXehcRwrH8x1HMaL 56vHD8EGJK+1arXAvcKUt5NMjLiZERLGV6MnghTKqJ1ybfRXWv7v9wXWAEBka3YzZM5K 4t3lQPf0jG40XgLFXkxLyyZ5qtskY/OFq6DPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=yQiwCi1E353FgRVqXXQlttIG+f2DCshMnrqJ9UP9x/E7816xk4uInNC5Qgqasn74BR P0x73IDtU0QcC+9aUPEvcW6SFhrWRtnP04RaPGAxo75pzSNE/SpfqjkdKzSlzLGCjfBf AKmdDQdRaTMEPIpu4sANqgfnC4T3IIvrknK5Y= Received: by 10.220.107.154 with SMTP id b26mr236598vcp.48.1269963859244; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.174.133 with SMTP id t5ls2761988vcz.2.p; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.73.21 with SMTP id o21mr13004vcj.21.1269963857830; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.73.21 with SMTP id o21mr13003vcj.21.1269963857805; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.147]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si13665107vws.5.2010.03.30.08.44.16; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.147 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.92.147; Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so2649302qwk.14 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.86.12 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BB0D4DF.2070501@gmail.com> <8EE07369-765A-49AB-AEC4-1DEC1A904C37@gmail.com> <20100330090253.GG3000@nvg.org> <59C6A282-0F28-4016-98C7-907FBD3C4379@gmail.com> <23298cb41003300332u6bde63fdk9f8b819fff7bf2ce@mail.gmail.com> <702226df1003300803m6caec9f7y7a66b3bf9b71009b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:44:16 -0300 Received: by 10.229.97.207 with SMTP id m15mr128474qcn.6.1269963856334; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17561003300844p1736516bm370e21b1b58b1d7f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] la .alis. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.147 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/62f96e395a91e500 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/2a2c073d051f7b9e Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Michael Everson wrote: > > So you're treating .i like a danda, or | not belonging to either sentence? What do people think about that? Syntactically, it is clearly a separator. But notice that so are ".i je", ".i ca bo", and such. It's not always just the single ".i" that is the separator. The tricky bit are the attitudinals that follow the separator, because semantically they apply to the following sentence but syntactically they attach to the separator. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.