From 3AlGySw8JBlE51v0tx4.xExAB76z5t14.v75472ut6z77z4xzA7D8B.v75@groups.bounces.google.com Tue Mar 30 12:29:32 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f141.google.com ([209.85.210.141]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3AlGySw8JBlE51v0tx4.xExAB76z5t14.v75472ut6z77z4xzA7D8B.v75@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1Nwh7v-0007lv-FN for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:31 -0700 Received: by yxe5 with SMTP id 5sf1987268yxe.2 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VRZ9dnk4coYmHJFO7jbZNQF6QmT+WE7GBpkz1ctWajw=; b=BDWLijEvTyPTZQBH4REXVXRSLp91ZefISISZ1y4oLsYibzty2eNZa2PTCakjDXogL8 KIvuPO+onm+E4il3/KyrONdflI6jo0rxk012rf8iwndvu1zfCQo84xOMguIOzv8iJpyY z8qMmpIh8dLM1/sYKA3OmIcvffK6G/iLA+VKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :message-id:references:to:x-mailer:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=FcC0YFR81pUsAVTTJBsRS5mwQLWhkrsW4R8WgN09ZBZihtiAHc4IQoFeRP4GIjL5pP FFMO+pJ3ROBSWAvkwqPBs1o8Jiw4Y0vpAz8R81fRnqWbzNnig4xgJUv+FcMzGCHi9Bfp vzWN3U6iu8RQg5H/SWfCzVj+5qyURGxsidf9Y= Received: by 10.90.19.14 with SMTP id 14mr79985ags.5.1269977346149; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.41.209 with SMTP id p17ls1321559ebe.1.p; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.95.139 with SMTP id d11mr712917ebn.20.1269977344641; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.95.139 with SMTP id d11mr712916ebn.20.1269977344598; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (mail-ew0-f217.google.com [209.85.219.217]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 11si336147ewy.9.2010.03.30.12.29.03; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of michael.everson@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.217 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.217; Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so4000102ewy.29 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.86.211 with SMTP id w61mr1963791wee.50.1269977343414; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (murrisk2.westnet.ie [88.81.100.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j8sm3528890gvb.1.2010.03.30.12.29.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Subject: Re: [lojban] la .alis. From: Michael Everson In-Reply-To: <32A2435D-5119-409E-8CAD-E5F899C5AAF1@mac.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:29:01 +0100 Message-Id: <9E58473C-A8AC-464F-826D-E44470D7F15F@gmail.com> References: <4BB0D4DF.2070501@gmail.com> <5715b9301003291146h66475c74off6625befee8fdf5@mail.gmail.com> <8EE07369-765A-49AB-AEC4-1DEC1A904C37@gmail.com> <20100330090253.GG3000@nvg.org> <59C6A282-0F28-4016-98C7-907FBD3C4379@gmail.com> <23298cb41003300332u6bde63fdk9f8b819fff7bf2ce@mail.gmail.com> <702226df1003300803m6caec9f7y7a66b3bf9b71009b@mail.gmail.com> <32A2435D-5119-409E-8CAD-E5F899C5AAF1@mac.com> To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of michael.everson@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=michael.everson@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: michael.everson@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/62f96e395a91e500 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/f410ac8e1598d38b Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30 Mar 2010, at 16:57, Kevin Reid wrote: > However, I almost agree with the notion of capitalizing that-after-the-= =93i=94, rather than the =93i=94 on *aesthetic* grounds, of not capitalizin= g the same letter all the time. I thought it an interesting idea too. But: > In the case of connectives, =93i Ja abuboi=94 feels very wrong to me, as = opposed to =93I ja abuboi=94 or =93i ja Abuboi=94. And then what happens to "i je nai ji=92a la Alis"? One rationale about jus= t using the "Sentence." convention mechanically is that it's just cosmetic.= No additional parsing or decisions need be made in that case. > (Note that this is written in the context of =93If we capitalize, where d= o we put it=94, without necessarily approving of capitalization at all.) I understand. Michael --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.