From 3AeizSwcJBugOiOYXecQWKSV.MYWVYTLKXQYYQVOQbYeZc.MYW@groups.bounces.google.com Wed Mar 31 17:26:02 2010 Received: from mail-yw0-f160.google.com ([209.85.211.160]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3AeizSwcJBugOiOYXecQWKSV.MYWVYTLKXQYYQVOQbYeZc.MYW@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1Nx8ER-0003ZH-7X for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:26:02 -0700 Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32sf665054ywh.28 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=6+7uWC93bLYiZSXsentRzic1318izSJInpklyFUU4aA=; b=mxtniGOMNm/mCzHKX1K4I9f+ex2gX9jLvuSMbgBR5lE3PkVx2Iz26nqQzDEJC5MVXS PX6MwC8msoO5SxnbHQVuAIU5ZXCdWcvGS5sRz9YCerKQPRjVcZYQ2mkytvtjlC0maQL+ hCHB4RLEzyc/pIa6OoHl8gLx+8puC+mcfZwrs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=w82k0OdduqPlag41zNfiFNS2sLE4SOWdqBi1L/wJKpVgaEVWFF6X875hKOUyRAsY5x DT3KNVAqxvdhz6qbFexSFwpif+7fu8zWZnrHc4WhLHnc2A4h7R5D6syEHd8c1PHwGbyQ dTmZ5439v2wPMQ1CmYRCKsfWIGPV2ofZ1i2cc= Received: by 10.91.133.13 with SMTP id k13mr94457agn.57.1270081537806; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:37 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.35.68 with SMTP id o4ls525882bkd.1.p; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.137.151 with SMTP id w23mr18600bkt.8.1270081535010; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.137.151 with SMTP id w23mr18599bkt.8.1270081534939; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com (mail-ww0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id v26si7380105bkt.3.2010.03.31.17.25.33; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.49; Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so494900wwa.36 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.2.209 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:25:33 -0600 Received: by 10.216.88.212 with SMTP id a62mr29751wef.72.1270081533634; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Summary: Cultural fu'ivla From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/6edf3f52e6f491ba X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/52b1bd4ecf63955b Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64559a5ea15048321e6b6 --0016e6d64559a5ea15048321e6b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Christopher Doty wrote: > But, before I do any of that, I'd like to make sure that a) people seem generally of the opinion that some change like this is > probably a good idea, You've got my vote. I'm definitely in agreement as to the proposed alteration. > b) that this is the right way to go about it, and I think the replacement gismu are the right way to go, I think the fu'ivla idea is a good one, and although I personally don't care if fu'ivla or cmene are used to represent any of the things being talked about, I do agree that autonymic, or ISO, is the way to go about making them. > c) that folks are ok with a relative newbie like me taking point in > coordinating things. I certainly don't want to step on people's toes, but > I'd also like to see this get done. I think that being willing to do it is enough qualification for you to do it. > Chris > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0016e6d64559a5ea15048321e6b6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Christopher Do= ty <suomichris= @gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>=A0=A0But, before I = do any of that, I'd like to make sure that
a) people seem generally of the = opinion that some change like this is probably a good idea,
=A0
You've got my vote. I'm definitely in agreement as to the prop= osed alteration.
=A0
b) that this is the right way to= go about it, and
=A0
I think the replacement gismu are the right way to go, I think the fu&= #39;ivla idea is a good one, and although I personally don't care if fu= 'ivla or cmene are used to represent any of the things being talked abo= ut, I do agree that autonymic, or ISO, is the way to go about making them.<= /div>
=A0
c) that folks are ok with a rela= tive newbie like me taking point in coordinating things. =A0I certainly don= 't want to step on people's toes, but I'd also like to see this= get done.
=A0
I think that being willing to do it is enough qualification for you to= do it.
=A0
Chris

--
You received this message because you= are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post t= o this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.= com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'= e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016e6d64559a5ea15048321e6b6--