From 3Y3C7SwsJBtoCB7ANAOBKN9CI6EH.8KIHKF76JCKKCHACNKQLO.8KI@groups.bounces.google.com Tue Apr 06 10:33:50 2010 Received: from mail-yw0-f160.google.com ([209.85.211.160]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3Y3C7SwsJBtoCB7ANAOBKN9CI6EH.8KIHKF76JCKKCHACNKQLO.8KI@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1NzCem-0006IM-GC for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:33:49 -0700 Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32sf42807ywh.28 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :received:message-id:date:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=0NTjB7Uthqufaw2G8rftySN4HNYVCUsMZMYwRFGwdkM=; b=lRFPqgtiAdrn1hVjWe9FtB8BF0UcqBFR+D9yfQZZgNso9GG0GItmDMwP4UBJPCZUAv PZLkK5JJQ3hrZHPpo1dm6WqulkcBCGoHkLJVVceHhyQO1AVWmVDPJcboxH8I1zBNsckJ w2p+pSIICz3TUGI03NtDmoOc+N98SYz2OrrzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=HZxOHKs2PGpXTlY1cVun0UEGneeNGulrWEc3hOygZaxPSZ4j4MtCxtXmpkiEQi4ExP arI619bIZreysxxOPPdL6oMPPSEPyLoDVcRQVFOA+Z9UKPNO86zoXJP/XZid7/U07fi/ CYZZj8clF+LkAmWsVHXWVIsdXL9MSsW9m3smQ= Received: by 10.91.121.20 with SMTP id y20mr496199agm.23.1270575203778; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:33:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.86.125.19 with SMTP id x19ls725459fgc.1.p; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.239.17 with SMTP id m17mr439296fgh.14.1270575201678; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.47.209 with SMTP id o17mr796164ebf.12.1270564097668; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.47.209 with SMTP id o17mr796163ebf.12.1270564097566; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ew0-f229.google.com (mail-ew0-f229.google.com [209.85.219.229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 17si831011ewy.11.2010.04.06.07.28.17; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of GFBeresford@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.229 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.229; Received: by ewy15 with SMTP id 15so385343ewy.4 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Received: by 10.213.38.212 with SMTP id c20mr645757ebe.17.1270564097343; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00c09f93d8caafc4a30483924147@google.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:28:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-announcements] Essay on the future of Lojban, with a simple poll for the co From: GFBeresford@gmail.com To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of GFBeresford@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=GFBeresford@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: gfberesford@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/c67f210addc06a0c X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/8642d03729415a84 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f93d8caafc4750483924144 --00c09f93d8caafc4750483924144 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 23:02, Robin Lee Powell > rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > > I would like Lojban to remain as close as it possibly can to its > > current state, regardless of whether I or a group of experienced > > Lojbanists see that improvements could be made. > > > > Agree or disagree? Disagree. Particularly on behalf of beginners; it is very helpful to have right and wrong answers to questions, which is (apparently) not the case currently. -Geoff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --00c09f93d8caafc4750483924144 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 23:02, Robin Lee Powell
> rlpowell@dig= italkingdom.org> wrote:
> > I would like Lojban to remain as= close as it possibly can to its
> > current state, regardless = of whether I or a group of experienced
> > Lojbanists see that = improvements could be made.
> >
> > Agree or disagree= ?
>

Disagree.

Particularly on behalf of begi= nners; it is very helpful to have right and wrong answers to questions, whi= ch is (apparently) not the case currently.

-Geoff

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--00c09f93d8caafc4750483924144--