From 3z_y9SwwJBtU3I197241E95C7D19C.3FDCFA21E7FF7C57IFLGJ.3FD@groups.bounces.google.com Thu Apr 08 08:57:32 2010 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3z_y9SwwJBtU3I197241E95C7D19C.3FDCFA21E7FF7C57IFLGJ.3FD@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1Nzu6e-00082T-2v for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:30 -0700 Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5sf2240811vws.16 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=uJDlo4D4d/BNjJd+KUGBexotCoX5HxFn9KpifMeivOk=; b=49EFzV9qz0ksIvbyjiyLsZkx99VR2klb3IQfBYwaVrpCTh7IRlEs1yJ5BVK1q3TBNY co7qy1vDtcL5F9YIvp1gyiiWI0NRKgXO3G5brtxLvfgeTpdOxXDuyP95u4DMcZZbht9c j44It5SGK/bx8S+zdSTx6GO18sgeIpGlZt1XE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=T3M85TyWEHmtiFtbJFnIgphvO+lGLJniepVJFNH6AWYZQhKhwSw87b6Ztm4izmH6CN 6drU0hLV+gr4CIUjJYSSxvWX4CbyZwnDMxIP+vLy97gpRddVDgdq97AeUpwb8rlxshYh JYyNIgpZnYBOnDszaND77bGyfH637ma7irskk= Received: by 10.220.121.221 with SMTP id i29mr29469vcr.31.1270742223111; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.87.130 with SMTP id w2ls1970514vcl.4.p; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.167.16 with SMTP id o16mr74826vcy.19.1270742221900; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.167.16 with SMTP id o16mr74824vcy.19.1270742221851; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 21si524117vws.1.2010.04.08.08.57.00; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.92.25; Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so687693qwi.27 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.87.140 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:57:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BBDF1B2.1030508@lojban.org> References: <4BBDF1B2.1030508@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:57:00 -0400 Received: by 10.229.214.7 with SMTP id gy7mr511293qcb.12.1270742220493; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Tangent the second: ASCII From: Craig Daniel To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=craigbdaniel@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: craigbdaniel@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/d319d5cadc183c24 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/4b4fac30b1f22340 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > > An alternate orthography is offered as part of the effort at rapprochement > with JCB's organization, and there is discussion of Cyrillic and Tengwar as > alternatives (but so far as I know, no one has ever seriously considered > using either of them). > I used to favor Cyrillic for Lojban handwriting, because I found my letterforms were more distinct from one another that way and I find I can read Lojban in both about equally well. My normal handwriting has since improved, so I don't use Cyrillic anymore. I wouldn't say that's like seriously considering Cyrillic for anything other than personal use, but it's not quite zero either. Still, if my notes from that period were found by another jbopre, I wouldn't expect them to be readable at a glance even by somebody fluent; ergo, Cyrillic is not de facto a standard form of Lojban writing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.