From 36Bm-SwoJBgwvvxxmynum4symux.o0yx0vnmzs00sxqs30614.o0y@groups.bounces.google.com Thu Apr 08 11:01:39 2010 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <36Bm-SwoJBgwvvxxmynum4symux.o0yx0vnmzs00sxqs30614.o0y@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1Nzw2n-0000wE-OR for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:39 -0700 Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5sf2330575vws.16 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L0/ypx7Gj946Eh/TVjDosx7vMOgugjJTe4nkOpmrQLE=; b=2UF+Cn7XvQ2edWyO0BzCN2qY7W2fqFqvOQNirkqOLxOhZ6KJsDSPmybzkPNK3tiQ5Z aiWLA1ZLajat0TGRJIWaU1mJiUY3AhAqSj2LSMhEAfpU6/IKvoRZh+IzKosRraRlJqUW CUY8nFWpUCEwnHJmaYmYegVjcKLJUnc9e3JS8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IHKKlB7pry5d31q4AkWy0BN+INzYZOz+TTnp/ERidmPMbbyjdrnjECVw7agYtGZzCZ mtcnKCddbSUT2mSxuWUbNttM6W8UTmcfbR0Ph1EOdYs01evJPttACNa947nebCztg4wg gTW4MzNrKRyu6K5wqMIhGYC4JLXQIcoFQ0u4s= Received: by 10.220.83.91 with SMTP id e27mr44430vcl.44.1270749672635; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.79.85 with SMTP id o21ls1984556vck.0.p; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.168.83 with SMTP id t19mr118994vcy.10.1270749671310; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.168.83 with SMTP id t19mr118993vcy.10.1270749671291; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f193.google.com (mail-qy0-f193.google.com [209.85.221.193]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si783148vws.0.2010.04.08.11.01.10; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.193; Received: by mail-qy0-f193.google.com with SMTP id 31so3803899qyk.20 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.212 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:01:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100408175114.GF11541@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20100405210225.GW6084@digitalkingdom.org> <4BBC3CE4.6080803@lojban.org> <4BBDECA2.5000500@lojban.org> <4BBE0713.6030903@lojban.org> <20100408175114.GF11541@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:01:09 -0300 Received: by 10.229.226.1 with SMTP id iu1mr721357qcb.19.1270749669679; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-announcements] Essay on the future of Lojban, with a simple poll for the community. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/c67f210addc06a0c X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/55875d02d17948c4 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I had no particular intention of completely splitting out the BPFK; > I don't see the point. =A0The community considers the LLG in charge of > the language, and I see no need to rock the boat in that respect. I think not every BPFK member is an LLG member, so in effect the BPFK is not strictly a commitee of the LLG, but those are formalites anyway. > My intention is to bring to the LLG membership a proposal for the > BPFK's quasi-independence under a new charter. > > If that doesn't work (which would, it seems to me, be the LLG > over-riding the community), then we can talk about your plan. =A0:) As lomg as it is clear that the BPFK's authority comes fom the community and not from the LLG membership, all is well. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.