From lojban+bncCPGMg4mHHBCi5f7dBBoEKDF3bg@googlegroups.com Fri Apr 09 16:05:33 2010 Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O0NGS-0002yJ-7w for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:33 -0700 Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21sf1797719gwj.16 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xXg5y39cPJJ0uGyya2/P0Tdf4NmiTUIMZjItjvqWre8=; b=OUNWgkjXsHFUhc19u5Ugwh9leR54hWOfaI7T6GG+trcva8YwiYuWecQq7qgrGW/IO1 aWijR/Fr00YGbahaT1H5XLQcBBzLskCnSLC8+xinxWmLYN+QlpgzOi5fspm9ww/T/d92 1FItjHluaR/5z0zPxq0GUFIby9P9K0Y/Dj03U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=aUEUTCz3OGT6aojKhAM3fZwV8zW1p5Pc+PnkJPvsoJQBB1YcANwbqrOn2wAcS8zmjg CHr0fS0wNwNoj2SUEBpS2bnAlxGNUrzS5KtJ/MoJwBnjIEIw8vgssIl1XhjBpXKBkwRI JEvyYa5Xv0GufRzS7B188fHnPfyjKFK6G42Gs= Received: by 10.90.125.12 with SMTP id x12mr163944agc.57.1270854307051; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.6.87 with SMTP id 23ls450224bky.0.p; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.22.69 with SMTP id m5mr54430bkb.19.1270854305644; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.22.69 with SMTP id m5mr54429bkb.19.1270854305616; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f173.google.com (mail-wy0-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id a10si1960197bkc.5.2010.04.09.16.05.04; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ivo.doko@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.173; Received: by mail-wy0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 20so569541wye.18 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.206 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:05:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:05:04 +0200 Received: by 10.216.171.145 with SMTP id r17mr409632wel.182.1270854304365; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Tangent the second: ASCII From: Ivo Doko To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ivo.doko@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ivo.doko@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: ivo.doko@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/d319d5cadc183c24 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/9d503c932fab1ced Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10 April 2010 01:00, MorphemeAddict wrote: > While Unicode may have already become the standard, it is still not easy = for > me to type any characters that aren't on the keyboard, including all > accented letters. I prefer ASCII whenever possible. > > stevo > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Christopher Doty > wrote: >> >> I'm wondering how closely tied people are to the idea that, if a >> hypothetical thing happened where Lojban got, say, tone, it should stick >> with ASCII-only characters? =A0I realize there was a good reason for thi= s in >> the past, but I have trouble seeing a reasoning for it now. =A0Just wond= ering >> how people feel about that now that Unicode has become the standard? =A0= ASCII >> is synonymous with "old-fashioned computing" to me, so just curious. >> (I think there are advantages both staying with ASCII or going by Unicod= e, >> and am not advocating for a change or anything; just curious what people >> think.) >> Chris >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > I believe that's why there are many different keyboard layouts. Perhaps it's time to discuss what Lojban keyboard layout should be? Has that ever been discussed or not because there was no need to discuss it since all the used characters were ASCII characters, which every keyboard layout has (should have)? --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.