From lojban+bncCMDl9o3BFBDTvIHeBBoEZifeLg@googlegroups.com Sat Apr 10 04:18:03 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f140.google.com ([209.85.210.140]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O0YhK-0002v3-Ld; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:18:03 -0700 Received: by yxe4 with SMTP id 4sf1979965yxe.28 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=DAoY3hAPYtGBKwdwigd3vjrh+6d6/DtXKmKSlebtvu0=; b=cSyQFcN9+uU+hxFiXjJRE7X0mfkF6Uyb9ZaJb5irL5kla/Ak/lJu4DVTlC/4HwRLqo nMB3+akXciZqkewdhxeoqQEWhqkxE6EaELalVHjGBQQ86VgqnCKePiHpb+u4TKuDuaOb ZWbutmWgBA1EpYYUBJKbIUTiM/SaCYI1KkoIc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :message-id:references:to:x-mailer:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=caEmTRkBQ1L7xmfPlGGEOK1apAIQe18LHyYJrDIrtJ3sCa3JbtVHJIHxd3LJhaHeKn XqtqEu1orCIqLhBwVZNHw82UUV5BnujdkHLInyd4G3cFXLzZ7myFU6uMhSfeed9/+j/t tk4jslu1eHdUbODqSiiY4NAjCE9HHhzowXLK4= Received: by 10.91.133.13 with SMTP id k13mr262155agn.23.1270898259436; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.35.68 with SMTP id o4ls611787bkd.1.p; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.13 with SMTP id g13mr87090bku.0.1270898256961; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.13 with SMTP id g13mr87089bku.0.1270898256901; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f170.google.com (mail-wy0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id h3si2608271bke.0.2010.04.10.04.17.35; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of michael.everson@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.170; Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so745187wyb.29 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.187.211 with SMTP id y61mr789544wem.42.1270898255681; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (murrisk2.westnet.ie [88.81.100.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm703173gve.14.2010.04.10.04.17.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Subject: Re: [lojban] MicroPoll From: Michael Everson In-Reply-To: <48e179af-ea85-467a-b885-5573ba206dd3@g10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:17:33 +0100 Message-Id: References: <48e179af-ea85-467a-b885-5573ba206dd3@g10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of michael.everson@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=michael.everson@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: michael.everson@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/45a736aad43704b3 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/9c324e2bd01a6dbc Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 10 Apr 2010, at 12:09, tijlan wrote: > I have put Robin's question on MicroPoll: > > http://micropoll.com/t/KD4ImZBFU4 I think a binary Yes/No answer to a complex question is not going to attract meaningful data. I can think of several reasons one might vote Yes and several other reasons one might vote No to that question as posed. Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.