From 307nESwoJBp0GGII7J8F7PDJ7FI.9LJILG87KDLLDIBDOLRMP.9LJ@groups.bounces.google.com Tue Apr 13 11:38:25 2010 Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <307nESwoJBp0GGII7J8F7PDJ7FI.9LJILG87KDLLDIBDOLRMP.9LJ@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1O1l02-0004ff-RH; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:38:24 -0700 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17sf904988gwb.16 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:38:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z+xHb4J1CmlWPsieJO3BV68+PP05UqKGR2LBzBW0Mgs=; b=RdD2UzbDxwd+FWPdCXGZGeimJxDcFs8mKPiaLiXKadtLA/fMw9V6rEm5CGuPIls3H0 vYS2XbkH0mMSp5/ShgZV5y00nIxzom0qRqYnJwi4tKKdWDo3QPio2olbQorPDLf6/Bdw sbAnSU3WmXuc+YEYj90toj6OiBhiruauB+pTQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=4wkfYYvCwuV/RN47XLYRVB62m8iDbwFfZlMCqiXGYDP1wjenZQpzBI5wYTu1XC5t5g MBDADfRNRlHX1AWLjtWsUr35BlRaN3G46H8/8E+KGvoBW4BCUMdQPJ4DWRp+VEu1Ujzm 3cMPKy4RLoAOCNXs39/ib8ODVNxzCfc+zbYwg= Received: by 10.91.91.11 with SMTP id t11mr985514agl.58.1271183828159; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:37:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.145.167 with SMTP id p39ls29226wej.0.p; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.157.8 with SMTP id n8mr157693wek.19.1271183826102; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.157.8 with SMTP id n8mr157678wek.19.1271183818276; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.221.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id p33si405385wba.7.2010.04.13.11.36.56; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.179; Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so1902428qyk.1 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:36:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:36:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BBE188B.8070807@lojban.org> <4BC36464.8010707@gmail.com> <4BC3B98F.5070805@gmail.com> <808704.84236.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:36:56 -0300 Received: by 10.229.227.83 with SMTP id iz19mr1939852qcb.44.1271183816143; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {le} in xorlo From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/33d26e8385fed297 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/b3a3ccb87595accf Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: >> a logical impossibility. > Because the {citka lo pipno} means that "eats the piano in its entirety"? No, that would be a physical impossibility, not a logical one. The logical impossibility is for three cows to do something when there are only two cows to select from. > =A0What if three cows are standing around, one of them eats a piano, and = then > a second cow eats the first cow (including the piano). =A0In this case it > would be true that {re lo ci bakni cu citka lo pipno}. =A0Am I right? I don't have enough experience with piano-eating cows to answer that, but if I eat a pig that has eaten a rotten tomato, I wouldn't say that I have eaten a rotten tomato. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.