From 3Lke1SwoJBnYmoigcWblcmagUcf.WigfidVUhaiiafYaliojm.Wig@groups.bounces.google.com Thu Apr 01 18:24:25 2010 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3Lke1SwoJBnYmoigcWblcmagUcf.WigfidVUhaiiafYaliojm.Wig@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1NxVcR-0004Ey-BA for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:24:25 -0700 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5sf1373244gyd.16 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:24:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:received:message-id:subject:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=3g2ppYWZeoo8KgTalt0iRxFhNODrRpE1Vb8pFM9jeMk=; b=3B4PS6HJ2Ds2qPFIqlevNTcmQ8dmOhMcJj+y4QiJ5UIKwOP/0sh3Tsedc4v443ApAV MgQ07ILuZ+C+LNOltqN9fgMnY+93dQyn337Vpj79IaBYHp29uigsuAYw1E87PWaul4rZ 249z7DoypLbIAjKlkCL4MeQuMBJrrYb4x/vfU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=rXhYzEQEQWcz68LRnFaoHiSlURyEjHtXgOHiNeI5p7DOqGugKCKalCnazwcVUOQFtN 8Di7bgblGPZHjBJAKL/Zazeq+sOExudHeeAuohs+wIJc/hE5jTwLjhTSgrDq125O7nD0 D5VAiLQYchtdl7I6oLfR7zBU2L5drOMsFW82Q= Received: by 10.150.210.21 with SMTP id i21mr98028ybg.77.1270171438630; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:23:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.91.91.7 with SMTP id t7ls350486agl.1.p; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.2.16 with SMTP id 16mr3371227agb.8.1270171437034; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.2.16 with SMTP id 16mr3371219agb.8.1270171436765; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 17si673241gxk.4.2010.04.01.18.23.55; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of suomichris@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.182; Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so342904gyg.13 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:23:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.5.20 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:23:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201003312350.52303.phma@phma.optus.nu> From: Christopher Doty Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:23:35 -0700 Received: by 10.100.200.4 with SMTP id x4mr4187719anf.125.1270171435360; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Summary: Cultural fu'ivla To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of suomichris@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=suomichris@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: suomichris@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/6edf3f52e6f491ba X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/22efe2076b15fff6 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e216535637b048336d5a6 --0016368e216535637b048336d5a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:48, Adam D. Lopresto wrote: > > I *still* don't see why the ISO codes are being used *at* *all*. In what > way > is this at all an advantage over starting with the autonym and coercing > that > into fu'ivla form? It seems like compressing that into three letters, and > then trying to expand those letters back out into a fu'ivla is just adding > one > complication after another. > See everything else I wrote today. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0016368e216535637b048336d5a6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:48, Adam D. Lopresto <adam@pubcrawler.org> wrote:<= br>

I *still* don't see why the ISO codes are being used *at* *all*. =A0In = what way
is this at all an advantage over starting with the autonym and coercing tha= t
into fu'ivla form? =A0It seems like compressing that into three letters= , and
then trying to expand those letters back out into a fu'ivla is just add= ing one
complication after another.

See everyth= ing else I wrote today.=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016368e216535637b048336d5a6--