From lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDbrcPeBBoEFqSj2Q@googlegroups.com Thu Apr 22 16:08:38 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O55VZ-0004qz-FJ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:38 -0700 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29sf93630wwb.16 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O7bKnlagA2jbWK1MWdvGwJSt5+zZfZxUddyLfX4D+zw=; b=hNewbzzxRR2K8AHR/bDnHhN3hDjquZZFMQ9r7NCRAIv3c4xsjumv316MBTe8Ly1ly2 +tqUzlWD1yLGhMJKf4n+MrMl3ObgwQ8srUPXk+atKFt9uqUkKIfUVa4NmeF/0Y3X+3tJ g3SHcdyB3lGESY3xUArqI+sul9to5eB/k/y2M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SFOeMFoHDY0Hlf74pDM0J5FHKFVtZ3NhkGLkyosPX4poR3ReTPtwISsHMqtgOx0tG8 v7W+kKj7NHXRYkqkeYpw+znXwDwLNMqiZ4TewBpOsFh+lqgeHqGiWdcps6sUIUGstOxZ OZNyVtYrnQrEfxfDzg3Sb2K6Wd7QXZc9rlEzc= Received: by 10.223.54.11 with SMTP id o11mr28693fag.30.1271977691544; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:11 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.32.71 with SMTP id b7ls7407630fad.0.p; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.74.69 with SMTP id t5mr2421300vcj.14.1271977689948; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.74.69 with SMTP id t5mr2421299vcj.14.1271977689920; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com (mail-qy0-f173.google.com [209.85.221.173]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b14si321215vcx.1.2010.04.22.16.08.08; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.173; Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so10994611qyk.17 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6d4d93ea-e660-4ad1-8910-02ddbb96f48c@b6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> References: <4BBE188B.8070807@lojban.org> <20100409014708.GB11541@digitalkingdom.org> <4BBF197D.6080601@lojban.org> <20100409222518.GN11541@digitalkingdom.org> <4BC02ABC.8000300@lojban.org> <4BC1D15A.5030409@lojban.org> <4BC36464.8010707@gmail.com> <6d4d93ea-e660-4ad1-8910-02ddbb96f48c@b6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:08:07 -0300 Received: by 10.229.246.82 with SMTP id lx18mr4949350qcb.80.1271977687906; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {le} in xorlo (was: Re: Response to Robin's "Essay on the future of Lojban" From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Daniel Brockman wrot= e: > On Apr 12, 8:20=A0pm, And Rosta wrote: >> >> I'm also wondering whether there exists an experimental >> specific KOhA, a nonanaphoric "it/them". (I think I used to >> use "le du" in lieu of such.) > > I've been using {le co'e} for this for quite a while, and I too > wish I had a KOhA for it. =A0It feels like a language hole. That reminds me, someone once proposed making "LE KU" grammatical. That's perfectly doable grammar-wise, and it immediately gives not only "le ku" but also "lo ku" (=3D zo'e), "loi ku", "lei ku", "lo'e ku" (=3Dzu'i?), "le'e ku", "lo'i ku", "le'i ku" in case anyone ever needs them. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.