From lojban+bncCJuP2OfEBBDnmcTeBBoEaim__w@googlegroups.com Thu Apr 22 19:59:13 2010 Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O596j-0002v8-HC; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:59:13 -0700 Received: by pvb32 with SMTP id 32sf2848601pvb.16 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:59:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=eh7jt/EO43J7feLLEq/NKDcb4XqPihbXZUZpMIN5L+k=; b=VLrWBaRboSShiW3SuaYwghvbZ6cPR0S5MWSL0rmTBe7AF42GoYt3wEbFzMUPzwbjEP RV0gBtPhn9SZg0iQxNzOOUJ6QVv61Nj6MbbqkgDSV0YioyxBoALZBpN6DsQHH9U+Jpj8 82xKtytx/9aja7LRQXOA3iU61U/c/pla1OGJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=CxMceOk4dFm9hTgaZ8YWtDsyYUMdMXN/3yZnlVhqlc8oUkbwZjCdai06NnT5Xs4dY0 j8sz8PJIe5mJxpUnK+z0lJejKHeju5pjCyZYo1Xq2+IT7JVZfu8jpajAdVpNzifl9Yke 2qlrevj/Tmwgl7VrYYJ2zF8qXo390TITEIyV4= Received: by 10.115.100.11 with SMTP id c11mr1214859wam.23.1271991527939; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:58:47 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.115.38.17 with SMTP id q17ls25986086waj.0.p; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.67.6 with SMTP id u6mr2141364wak.21.1271991525738; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.67.6 with SMTP id u6mr2141363wak.21.1271991525694; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vw0-f51.google.com (mail-vw0-f51.google.com [209.85.212.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si102555pzk.7.2010.04.22.19.58.44; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of adamgarrigus@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.51; Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so345628vws.10 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:58:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.168.140 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:57:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BBE188B.8070807@lojban.org> <4BC1D15A.5030409@lojban.org> <4BC36464.8010707@gmail.com> <6d4d93ea-e660-4ad1-8910-02ddbb96f48c@b6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <7913e18e-b0f2-4b18-bb4d-ecf39ef60f38@v14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:57:08 -0400 Received: by 10.220.47.220 with SMTP id o28mr7432431vcf.126.1271991429019; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {le} in xorlo (was: Re: Response to Robin's "Essay on the future of Lojban" From: "komfo,amonan" To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of adamgarrigus@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=adamgarrigus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6464f5850c0bd0484de95cf --0016e6464f5850c0bd0484de95cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/4/22 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:26 PM, komfo,amonan > wrote: > > > > Hoo boy. I hesitate to wade into this discussion, but what's the > difference > > between the following?: > > > > *lo poi ge broda gi brode > > > > and > > > > lo broda je brode > > Well, probably very little. (Except nobody really knows for sure what > a tanru is supposed to mean.) > > But the "poi" clause is more flexible: "lo poi broda ko'a gi'e brode > ko'e" for example, with no "be". > > Or "lo poi mi djuno lo du'u ke'a mokau". Try doing that with a tanru. > ua mi ca jmize'a ganse le kevna pe'a .i ki'e mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --0016e6464f5850c0bd0484de95cf Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/4/22 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:26 PM, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hoo boy. I hesitate to wade into this discussion, but what's the d= ifference
> between the following?:
>
> *lo poi ge broda gi brode
>
> and
>
> lo broda je brode

Well, probably very little. (Except nobody really knows for sure what=
a tanru is supposed to mean.)

But the "poi" clause is more flexible: "lo poi broda ko'= a gi'e brode
ko'e" for example, with no "be".

Or "lo poi mi djuno lo du'u ke'a mokau". Try doing that w= ith a tanru.

ua mi ca jmize'a ganse le kevna p= e'a .i ki'e mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016e6464f5850c0bd0484de95cf--