From 3NwO2SwYHBjwinpcgbkYa.amkjmhZYlemmejcepmsnq.amk@groups.bounces.google.com Fri Apr 02 07:46:47 2010 Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3NwO2SwYHBjwinpcgbkYa.amkjmhZYlemmejcepmsnq.amk@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1Nxi8w-0003d5-Bw for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:46:47 -0700 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5sf1988682gyd.16 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:46:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:x-originating-ip:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=dkfuyg2hFpZNqgW9tK4N8DgboY5alNGm/qt40Pz2hJk=; b=Add8Fa3W+DLKCsYrVBLCRm3Ls/LOMZc1yBK+b6f/QGNUS6HajUH3ExM7tM+RJwMQiZ DmwmB1pQBO2JF4UhBSVVMEhMph+7QMHDFpLmEfWMgtl8BibX/z/AUCB1iELxY+Yq7+fx hGFcV48rXtX2QyZmfkWyzMvXWh1hTvrIOGpLU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-originating-ip:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=OgBD3Lq8YdGxvbqYwqfYVb9qRl2UmjEHCuF9rbqjr6BO80HGW3VIBrz7BdMZNq61wf oj/WFBULMMoJc5qVVG5G1BEs3aHrDabrUeIpXFFROjGMY0hq344C1wXxS4e0jL054tnh edwsPTif6Z8a8ozrAaQ9eclkHKdAouCuzyh38= Received: by 10.91.84.19 with SMTP id m19mr330144agl.12.1270219575638; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.28.1 with SMTP id k1ls541228ibc.3.p; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.147.148 with SMTP id l20mr146217ibv.1.1270219573662; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.147.148 with SMTP id l20mr146215ibv.1.1270219573617; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kcout01.prserv.net (kcout01.prserv.net [12.154.55.31]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si1379829iwn.2.2010.04.02.07.46.13; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning kpreid@mac.com does not designate 12.154.55.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=12.154.55.31; Received: from [ipv6:::1] (linode.feoh.org[97.107.129.138]) by prserv.net (kcout01) with SMTP id <2010040214461320100hcg3de> (Authid: usinet.kpreid); Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:46:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [97.107.129.138] Message-Id: <0E4981A9-80D0-4A20-8291-3B4B78ED50F5@mac.com> From: Kevin Reid To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [lojban] BPFK Announcement: Orthography Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:46:11 -0400 References: <20100401165252.GK6084@digitalkingdom.org> <20100401173644.GM6084@digitalkingdom.org> <20100401175018.GC2477@alice.local> <20100401180500.GD2477@alice.local> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning kpreid@mac.com does not designate 12.154.55.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kpreid@mac.com X-Original-Sender: kpreid@mac.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/11b07957f4e1e945 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/72a062bb3e089700 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes On Apr 2, 2010, at 9:58, Jonathan Jones wrote: > Oh. My. Wow. > > Give it a rest, man. Lighten up, man! > What I said was not meant to be taken seriously. It's fun to take a joke seriously! It's also useful practice in logically correct interpretation/ production of sentences, which *IS* an important skill to use Lojban fluently and correctly. > Starting a debate on the *logic* of the statement is not the desired > response. I don't see a debate; I see Lojban practice and teaching. > And please stop writing lojban like that. The proposal was an April > Fool's joke. We know it's a joke. We're just continuing the theme of the source material -- which, furthermore, is the preexisting t-shirt, not the orthography AFJ. -- Kevin Reid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.