From lojban+bncCNuStaWoDxD91MfeBBoEiswNXg@googlegroups.com Fri Apr 23 11:44:43 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O5Nri-0000yS-FQ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:43 -0700 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21sf938783wya.16 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:message-id:date :from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KI2AeVqzo+b5oLKo64Q9aW2+WQzrzAGH9yYkKQk2U+c=; b=ksZYFSAz/URUk1Ku18YrmYNFSakMW77tTmLGv0SvER8xjgOX94DYuNczUSzU5mbQk7 UoTmExA91p9Ohq5PemNZZ773qRTHN5OmGs9SeTNkIxNL8mdLq4vIHnNaWiidZd/8YweJ Y9Eie5WSY2867VQKRUgO1S/k1YNEr7duGuQUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=0r0XySAwsaypYhAif5/82Wtjs3k1gzQXYdLq+pScwdrRkNi+eUlhhmkhj+swLUTFo/ UrELfAhYPjAn9+hlF5qnDikF0gFb6Kb+NxIv6EdbsMmVgDeiTXJFh1PfRXbYjhMEVRuW Bk/4v3kEZrRuqTQ568RW5QpiobxeE6PiSYKiY= Received: by 10.223.54.11 with SMTP id o11mr189009fag.5.1272048253334; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.24.105 with SMTP id w83ls4742375wew.1.p; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.186.81 with SMTP id v59mr44722wem.15.1272048252136; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.186.81 with SMTP id v59mr44721wem.15.1272048252118; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id h17si1614788wbh.1.2010.04.23.11.44.11; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.42; Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so2130819wwi.15 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.157.202 with SMTP id o52mr525680wek.227.1272048250887; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.72] (87-194-76-9.bethere.co.uk [87.194.76.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm837247wbx.1.2010.04.23.11.44.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BD1EA77.3070908@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:44:07 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {le} in xorlo References: <4BBE188B.8070807@lojban.org> <20100409222518.GN11541@digitalkingdom.org> <4BC02ABC.8000300@lojban.org> <4BC1D15A.5030409@lojban.org> <4BC36464.8010707@gmail.com> <6d4d93ea-e660-4ad1-8910-02ddbb96f48c@b6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <7913e18e-b0f2-4b18-bb4d-ecf39ef60f38@v14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jorge Llamb=EDas, On 23/04/2010 02:07: > We would also have: "LE relative-clause KU" (as well as the more > obvious "LE KU relative-clause") Do they mean the same thing? I remember we discussed it once, many years ag= o, but can't remember the answer. =20 > The nice thing about "LE relative-clause" is that it is just like > Spanish. English doesn't allow that construction, but Spanish does. >=20 > And it makes poi'i/seka sort of redundant to "lo poi ge broda gi broda". >=20 > Yes, this definitely should be allowed. Do you have some kind of record of these ideas? And will we at long last st= art seeing them implemented? --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.