From 3GSS2SwoJBj8kkmmbncjbthnbjm.dpnmpkcbohpphmfhspvqt.dpn@groups.bounces.google.com Fri Apr 02 10:07:05 2010 Received: from mail-yx0-f146.google.com ([209.85.210.146]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <3GSS2SwoJBj8kkmmbncjbthnbjm.dpnmpkcbohpphmfhspvqt.dpn@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1NxkKe-0003vl-Na for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:07:01 -0700 Received: by yxe10 with SMTP id 10sf1937940yxe.16 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=gmpTCtPpFRXmZUHIMuvwG2MHMUkDwq1VGOu3RtvLcv4=; b=jh33Lfas4fS5oSihv5S/3bKGs3LLoRuCNNAO+ql0yYf6fpUVwAHdIKACT8TQJwKob/ RLLbnn6QvtEMlhn89R5a7vahZYAYxjlh4oVN6FZDy9k2rpvxDBhf+gUiZ/WSkzvCO/Rv A+2mvZ5/i9tK9+gCqQO85jSLQDVCppadxVgXo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=IRm6BeefahbrSuZmef/m5ltAu142pX9C+6hupcruN2akeL9rXUGWjfmbS4NtpmX15+ UQ16FHlA+ms54/NCzCBKIQdhmpU6C+M32zJ4WjwHC1SD0Rvnwm6rhQ8ecemlj9X1ByIc PivqCr0T77a56SqUvJwfutFcEjJJZqEKNBl6w= Received: by 10.90.19.14 with SMTP id 14mr352004ags.5.1270227993755; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.6.77 with SMTP id 13ls1136830bky.3.p; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.13 with SMTP id g13mr32866bku.20.1270227992367; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.140.13 with SMTP id g13mr32865bku.20.1270227992331; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e24si10694473bke.6.2010.04.02.10.06.30; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.92.25; Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so769071qwh.23 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.67 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:06:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201004012357.49645.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:06:30 -0300 Received: by 10.229.91.16 with SMTP id k16mr4019102qcm.40.1270227990391; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] So what do we say for Swedish? (was "Summary: Cultural fu'ivla") From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/t/b7cc2efa3fc3ba64 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/msg/b42604535fcaa040 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > I think I prefer Christopher's language/family naming method, as presented > in the topic this one came from. The problem is it only works for a few selected examples, not as a general rule. In my opinion, if you are going to use the codes, then there should be a systematic transformation to get the fu'ivla from the code and the code from the fu'ivla. Otherwise, I see no point in preferring the code to the autonym. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.